IS HILLARY TOO OLD TO REPRESENT FEMALE MILLENNIALS?
…Millennial Women Voters for
Bernie Sanders in New Hampshire
Madeline Albright and Gloria Steinem were the wrong Hillary
supporters for New Hampshire.
If you look
seriously at the major difference between the votes for Bernie Sanders and
Hillary Clinton, there is only one major place to look. That is at the group of New Hampshire women
voters under 30 years of age.
Back in 2008,
when Hillary was 8 years younger, the outlook of the women’s movement for the
then first time women voters could still identify with the feminism of women
like Hillary. These feminists were the ones that
had spent their lives “breaking the glass
ceiling” for future generations of women.
This was what
the former first-ever female Secretary of State, Madeline Albright and the feminist Gloria Steinem were trying to say when they showed their support
for Hillary Clinton last week. It was a real
surprise to many women over 50, when it was learned that many women under 30
were insulted when Secretary Albright made her statement that: “There’s a special place in hell for women
who don’t help each other.” Albright was referring to the need for women
voters to support Hillary.
And the
younger group was also upset when Gloria Steinem said, “When you’re young, you’re thinking, ‘Where are the boys?’ The boys are
with Bernie.” This same Ms. Steinem
was the co-founder of Ms. magazine and an iconic leader of
the ’60s feminist movement.
The surprise
for all of the younger women was the idea from these older women that all women
should support Hillary, just because she is a woman. They also disagreed with Ms. Steinem’s idea
that the girls would be with the boys because the girls always follow their
boyfriends.
Those young
women in New Hampshire were saying, “How
dare Steinem insinuate that young women are just chasing boys? And, how dare
Albright to curse young women for failing to support Clinton!”
During the
cable TV coverage on election day, the networks showed some college students on
a student shuttle that was taking students from the local college, to and from
the voting auditorium. The reporter on
the shuttle asked those that had just voted, “How many of you voted for Bernie?”
Virtually every hand in the bus went up.
When the reporter asked, “How many
voted for Hillary? Only 2 hands went up.”
The polls had shown that 80% of the women under 30 supported Bernie
Sanders. Once again, he polls were right.
The reality is
that the feminist of the past have done a very good job. But for young women today under 30, these older
feminists are sorely out of touch with today’s younger women. The world these
older women knew and helped change has now produced a new generation that is no
longer as concerned with the issues that were so important to their mothers and
grandmothers.
Needless to
say, progressive millennial women are tilting toward Bernie Sanders rather than
for a woman who would be the first female president of the United States. The
older feminist are asking, “What are
these young women thinking?”
To these older
women, they came from the time when it was true that many of the “girls” did follow the “boys” with the purpose of finding a life-mate. They were not considering which political candidate should receive their vote. As one young women said, “I’m listening to what the candidates stand
for and which ones think as I do about the future. I’m insulted that they think I am supposed to
vote for someone because of their gender.
If I liked a woman candidate’s ideas better, I would vote for her”
Personally, I
don’t think that is the whole truth for the current young female support for
the 72 year old Sanders.
I believe that
young progressive women are attracted to the older guy because he’s promising a
dream in which the rich have less and the less-rich have more. These younger
women are not kids. Many are working
women and married with kids. Many are
also dealing with expensive college loans, and they see their own parents
having problems with health care costs and in making ends meet. They see Bernie Sanders as an honest
politician that says things that would make their family's lives better.
Another point
is that Bernie’s message is short, clear and concise. Hillary’s message is less clear when she
says: “I’m more qualified, trust me to do
things for you.” Since Hillary has
been in politics since 1972, she is part of the “establishment”, whether she likes it or not. Today, “establishment”
for this election has become a “dirty
word”. The do-nothing Washington “establishment” is the reason so many of
the members of both parties are so angry.
Plus, the
Republicans have done an excellent job of putting doubt in people’s minds that
Hillary is not “trustworthy”. Let’s face it, they have been going
after Hillary nationally since the early 1990’s and they’ve never let up. I give Hillary a lot of credit for her
tenacity. But having a whole political party on
your back for over 25 years can take a big toll. In addition, the younger people today have no
background for understanding what Hillary and other strong feminist women have
done to make these younger women’s lives better.
The following
will show the difference between those young women that support Bernie, and
some older New Hampshire women that had decided to vote for Hillary.
The decision
that older women have voted for Hillary was because, even though they actually
preferred what Bernie had to offer, these older women were concerned about what
Bernie’s ideas would do to increase their taxes. They were concerned about the costs of
Bernie’s programs and how the programs were going to be paid for. For the most part, the younger women really
did not pay that much attention to taxes, as they haven’t worked for very long and haven’t made that much income. Therefore,
they've had no real history in paying large tax bills.
As Kathleen
Parker of The Post has written: “What is obvious, if bittersweet, is that
Steinem and Albright, and possibly Clinton by association, have passed the
baton, without realizing it. Through their temerity and hard work, they’ve
created a world in which their original purposes have become obsolete through
acceptance. Millennial women and those afterward have never known a world in which
they were not treated to daily doses of "go-girl" power. They’ve never known a
time when abortion wasn’t an option. They really can have it all, including the
choice to not vote for a woman just because she’s a woman, because, after all,
that would be sexist.”
That pretty
much says it all for today's millennial women.
Copyright G.Ater 2016
Comments
Post a Comment