SOCIAL MEDIA: AN EXCITING NEW PLATFORM FOR POLITICAL INFO….BUT
Twitter, the bird of Social Media
Social Media: we do not yet know
what it will mean for American democracy
Here are some
truths about today’s American millennials
“According to a Pew Research Center survey
conducted in January, 35% of respondents between ages 18 and 29 said that
social media was the “most helpful” source of information about the
presidential campaign. For those aged 30 to 49, social media ranked third,
behind cable TV and news websites.”
To show you
how fast social media has grown, do you realize that per The Post: “This is only the
third presidential election since Twitter was launched and since Facebook
opened to the public, both in 2006. And it’s only the second election since
Instagram and Snapchat joined the social-media fray. Already, these online
platforms are essential to modern campaigns.”
But we do know
that more and more people rely on social media for news and information,
and younger voters in particular, increasingly get their news from social
media.
It is also not
surprising that social media is less popular among voters 50 and older. According to the Pew survey, older Americans
still depend primarily on television and other traditional news outlets to
learn about elections.
But we do know
that Donald Trump’s presidential campaign’s main communication tool is Twitter.
The good and
the bad of all this is, because social media is so young, political
science hasn’t figured out the political implications of how citizens use it to
get their news. Research has found that consuming news makes people more likely
to vote. Now in theory, democracy should benefit from the presence of more
information sources.
One positive
effect that seems to be happening with social media is that exposure to
information, even for audiences that are not seeking it, can increase political
participation, at least online.
Some research
has found that social media can affect political engagement.
A study
conducted in Germany, Italy and Britain during their 2014 European Parliament elections found that citizens who were
less interested in news and politics became more politically engaged after
coming across news and political information on social media. That included
activities such as emailing a political leader, signing an online petition
and encouraging friends to vote.
We all know
that historically, youth turnout is lower than that of older voters, and that
voter turnout increases with age. One thing that helps increase the likelihood
of voting is consuming news and political information. Could an increase in
access to news via social media boost the turnout of younger voters? The initial reviews say “yes”, but we seriously don’t yet know for sure. Despite its growing popularity, social
media’s influence on political participation still remains unclear.
The one issue
that Donald Trump has made clear is that using social media late at night
without thinking, can get you into trouble.
In this latest
episode, because Trump cannot take any criticism, at some time in the early AM,
he Tweeted that Hillary Clinton had been set-up by a “con” person in Hillary’s
debate comments about how Trump treated the Miss Universe winner when she had
gained weight. Hillary’s comment was an
attempt to once again communicate how Trump has treated women over the years. Of course, Trump also said he had actually
saved the Miss Universe’s job because the pageant was threatening to remove the
pageant winner’s crown. But the pageant
has since reported that they never considered that as an option.
The point here
is that Trump is overusing this social media, and in this particular case, it
doesn’t look like it’s helping his cause.
This is not the first time Trump has gotten on Twitter in the middle of the night, and as before, it has again
backfired on him.
This political
use of social media was first seriously used in President Obama’s elections.
A common
narrative from the 2008 presidential election was that the Obama campaign
motivated younger voters through social media. Post-election studies, however,
have not consistently been able to verify this idea. Not all young people are open to political
information in their Twitter or Facebook feeds. Whether young voters
accept political talk on Facebook depends on their views on conflict in
general. One study found that those who avoid conflict tend to dislike
political posts. Those who say they enjoy conflict, on the other hand, post
political content more frequently.
This study
concluded that young voters are open to political information on social media
only when it is presented in a civil manner.
That’s not a good thing for Donald Trump’s approach to social media.
If that study
is correct, Trump’s Tweets do not do
favors for him with the younger, voting age millennials.
Another issue
that social media has brought up is that gathering political information via
social media is an increased risk of the digesting information from
questionable sources. As an example,
Trump is consistently Tweeting
information and statements that are not true.
These studies
have found that as humans, we pick up ideas throughout our lives, but many
times we don’t recall from where they originated. In the past, a bit of information ideas may
have been read it in a reputable newspaper like the New York Times, or the Washington
Post. But then again, was it
overheard from someone while at the office watercooler?
This means
that social media might be making it easier to spread false information and for
politicians to manipulate the voters. With social media, we tend to read and
quickly digest ideas and views from individuals whom we already consider “friends” or “professionals”. But because
of this, the brain tends to mix this information with that from the news media.
How well will
citizens remember whether they heard a particular idea from their Uncle Joe or
their friends on Facebook, or was it a Washington Post item from Twitter?
Donald Trump
and the GOP are showing us that we
need to be careful as to where we obtain our political information, especially
if we are followers of social media.
Remember, as with the Internet, just because it is available on Google
or from Twitter or Facebook, does not mean it’s real or
correct.
Obviously,
social media is an exciting new platform for political information, opinion,
and even dialogue. But as of today, we do not yet understand what these
platforms will mean for our democracy.
This is especially true among the young voters who mostly rely on social
media.
And remember,
these individuals will eventually become the future leaders of America.
Copyright G.Ater 2016
Comments
Post a Comment