ANOTHER KOCH SPONSORED ATTEMPT, DOOMED TO FAIL
The Brothers Grimm: Charles & David Koch
Yes, they will spend millions in
trying to steal America’s treasures.
I had hoped
that we had seen and heard the last from Mr. Big Bucks, Mitt Romney.
But now “Mr. 47%” has opened his mouth again and
really ticked me off. No, it’s not about
“Binders full of women”, or “My wife drives a couple of Cadillacs….”
or even “Self-deportation”.
Since Mitt has
now taken the role as the multimillionaire, senior statesperson of the GOP, he has now really stepped in it by
saying,, “I don’t know why the US
government owns so much land…..what is the purpose?”
What Romney
was referring to was regarding the millions of US acres that are tied up in
America's public parks, federal forests, government seashores, wilderness areas, historic
lands and land preserves.
Once again,
Romney has shown that he still lacks the ability to understand or communicate
with the average, working American.
This wealthy Republican apparently doesn’t
understand the purpose of these public lands. A purpose by-the-way that was started by the first Republican
President, Abraham Lincoln. President Lincoln set
aside the first public land in 1864 when he designated California’s Yosemite Valley as a state park
expressly to be, “held for public use of resort
and recreation”.
Oh, and it was another Republican president, Theodore Roosevelt who reserved 280,000
square miles of public land. That's the same area as the state of Texas. This was set aside for future
generations of Americans. In 1905, “Teddy” Roosevelt wrote, “Our people should see to it that America’s
national parks are preserved for their children and their children’s, children
forever, with their majestic beauty all unmarred.”
As the progressive writer, Jim Hightower
wrote about Mr. Romney, “Sir, these
properties are there for “us”. That
means those millions of work-a-day American families who don’t summer in the South of
France or have a getaway ski mansion over-looking Aspen.”
As compared to what the Romney’s and the Koch
Brothers would prefer, these properties are not there to become a theme park, a
strip-mine, a mall, an oil field or any property that produces one cent in
profit for a group such as Koch
Industries or Romney’s previous Bain Capital
Corporation.
So, are these public properties really that important to
most Americans?
Well, for those Americans that do not have a
portfolio of millions of bucks, last year our national parks had 292 million
visitors. That’s 19 million more than
the previous year.
This year is the Centennial of the American National Park Service (NPS) and is
expected to be even busier.
The issue is that today, so far not one of
the current presidential hopefuls, (and
we have a pot-load of them), not one has had one thing to say about making
an issue of our park’s dilapidated facilities. They have not mentioned what they would do regarding the shortened park hours, closed off
park sections, locked park visitor centers, cancelled Summer programs, park
ranger shortages, pot-holed park roads and on and on.
I, and many Americans are continuing to grow
angry, as these politicians will subsidize wealthy people’s private jets, yachts,
and their multiple vacation homes with tax cuts, while they constantly cut funds for public
parklands.
But now, they are going way too far, and once
again, the Billionaire Koch Brothers are at the heart of it.
Two Koch Brothers-funded groups, ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council)
and the Americans for Prosperity are
teaming up to re-instate an almost dead-horse issue called “state’s rights”. Yep, with their pockets stuffed with big
bucks from the Koch Brothers and big oil, these groups are going after all
federally owned lands and pushing for them to be transferred back to the states. These are the haters of the US government
and their campaign to “take back” federal
lands.
So, guess which Republicans have joined the
sponsors of this proposed bill referred to as the “Sagebrush Rebellion Act”?
Well, it’s no surprise that the wacko-bird,Texas Senator Ted Cruz, and the former Pennsylvania Senator, Rick Santorum,
have both been pushing similar “take-back”
bills.
But fortunately there are 4 reasons why this
probably won’t work. The 4 reasons are:
1. None of the states have the money to support taking over
these vast pieces of land.
2. The idea was to privatize the parks for raising big bucks
for the states. But public opinion is
totally against putting “private property”
signs up that locks out the public from swimming, camping, fishing, or hunting,
3. As Jim Hightower wrote, “Their pipedream is enormously unpopular with normal people who don’t
wear tri-cornered hats with tea bags dangling from them.” It was found that 95% of the voters agree
that protecting national parklands is an appropriate role for the federal
government. And 9 out of 10 Republican
voters also agreed and 96% of all Americans want universal access to all public
lands.
4. Finally, the “state’s
rights” claim is pure B.S.. When the
states joined the Union, they all signed agreements that renounced claims to
the federal public properties. The
agreed statements say “ the people
inhabiting said proposed state do agree and declare that they forever disclaim
all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within the
boundaries thereof.”
It is shameful as to what this small group of
wealthy profiteers are attempting. These
treasures of our public lands belong to us all and to attempt to take them away
would become a Battle for America’s Public Soul.
We will never allow this to happen.
Copyright G.Ater
2015


Comments
Post a Comment