EVEN GOP SENATE LEADER SAYS THE COURTS WILL DECIDE IF TRAVEL BAN IS LEGAL
…The Senate Majority Leader, Mitch
McConnell
Trump’s comment about a federal
judge being a “so-called judge”, again proves Trump is incapable of being
“Presidential”.
Once again, we
Americans are embarrassed by the actions of our novice president.
I knew that at
some point I would be seriously missing President Obama. I had hoped we could at least get to the new
president’s 1st month in the office.
But here I am,
seriously missing our first African American president, and Trump has only
finished his 2nd week in office.
What is so
embarrassing is that once again, instead of attacking an issue, the president
had to strike down personally at a federal judge. US presidents should never "strike down" at anyone.
In a series of
tweets early in the morning after Friday’s ruling by the Seattle judge James
Robart, the president wrote: “The opinion
of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law enforcement away from our
country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!” Of course, the president's ruling hasn’t been over turned
and as of 24 hours of the ninth court’s decision, 26 different states Attorney
Generals, and multiple judges from all of the US federal circuits across the
country are against the travel ban as being unconstitutional.
Trump also
wrote: “When a country is no longer able
to say who can, and who cannot , come in & out, especially for reasons of
safety &.security – big trouble!”
He added: “Interesting that
certain Middle-Eastern countries agree with the ban. They know if certain
people are allowed in it’s death & destruction!” However, no one seems to know which “Middle-Eastern countries” the president
was referring to.
But not only
was the ruling NOT over-ruled, the next morning the state department said it
had reversed all the visa revocations, meaning that tens of thousands of people
whose visas were not physically canceled after the issuing of the executive
order, these people may now travel freely.
The president said only about 100 people were affected, but a justice department official said over 100,000 visas had been revoked
under the ban.
On morning
after the ruling, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
said it would comply with Judge Robart’s order.
“In accordance with the judge’s ruling, DHS
has suspended any and all actions implementing the affected sections of the
executive order,” said acting press secretary Gillian Christensen. “DHS personnel will resume inspection of
travelers in accordance with standard policy and procedure.” Christensen also said the justice department
intended to counter by filing an emergency stay of Trump’s order, calling it “lawful and appropriate”.
So, just
exactly what was it that Trump started with his knee-jerk approach to announcing a travel ban?
Trump’s
executive order had suspended all refugee admissions for 120 days and from Syria
indefinitely, and it had placed time-limited holds on the admission of
travelers from seven countries including Iraq, Syria, Iran, Yemen, Sudan, Libya
and Somalia. The White House and
justice department had argued that the order was necessary for national
security.
However, the
reason the Trump Administration had chosen these countries is that In December 2015, President Obama had signed into law a measure placing
limited restrictions on certain travelers who had visited Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or
Syria on or after March 1, 2011. Two months later, the Obama administration added
Libya, Somalia, and Yemen to the list, in what it called an effort to address
"the growing threat from foreign terrorist fighters."
The
restrictions specifically limited what is known as visa-waiver travel by those
who had visited one of the seven countries within the specified time period.
People who previously could have entered the United States without a visa were
instead required to apply for one if they had traveled to one of the seven
countries.
Under the Obama law, dual citizens of visa-waiver
countries and Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria could no longer travel to the U.S.
without a visa. Dual citizens of Libya, Somalia, and Yemen could, however,
still use the visa-waiver program if they hadn't traveled to any of the seven
countries after March 2011.
But the Trump
order also provided preference to people from religious minorities in those
countries, and Trump had said in an interview he would give Christians priority
as refugees.
This of course
is the real crux of the order. This
makes the order an unconstitutional infringement of religious freedom.
The American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other parties quickly filed lawsuits
around the question of whether the ban was unconstitutional and an infringement of religious freedom. A
succession of rulings against the government instantly followed.
Some Airport authorities
continued to hold or bar travelers from the listed countries, leading to
charges that the Trump White House was encouraging the airports to disregard
court rulings. Such charges will probably be repeated in light of Trump’s
promise to “overturn” Robart’s opinion. Most legal experts say Trump efforts will fail.
But please consider that this judge
was a George W. Bush appointment and the ruling came from the most liberal of all of
the federal districts. Even so, a Bush appointee
saw that after hearing arguments from both Washington state and Minnesota, it was
obvious that the president’s order unlawfully discriminated against Muslims and
caused unreasonable harm.
Even an
uninvolved employee at the Dubai airport
described to The Post “the mixed messages, confusion and the
emotional toll” the order has taken at his airport.
But, as
expected, the Trump White House said
it would appeal against the ruling, which it first called “outrageous” before issuing an “updated”
statement that did not feature that word.
“The president’s order is intended to protect
the homeland and he has the constitutional authority and responsibility to
protect the American people,” the irate White
House press secretary Sean Spicer said.
However, even the Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) informed all US airlines on Friday night
that they should allow travelers from the affected countries with valid visas
who had been barred under the order to board flights to the US.
But internally
at the White House, they are not smiling.
Trump’s senior adviser Steve Bannon and his policy chief Stephen Miller
that were responsible for the ruling's writing and its rollout, they have come under intense
scrutiny. Trump may have approved of the
concepts, but he is not happy with the way it was rolled out. Trump’s Republican party has however, now backed
the order, though some senior figures did oppose it or criticized its
implementation.
Trump’s issues
with the roll-out are mainly because the worldwide reaction has been almost
unanimously critical.
And in the US, only one
federal judge in Massachusetts has declined to extend the stay against the
order issued last week. He has expressed skepticism that the ban represented
religious discrimination. Think about it.....only one US judge.
But in
Seattle, one of the 26 attorney generals, Bob Ferguson of Washington state, told
reporters outside the courtroom: “We are
a nation of laws. Not even the American president can violate the constitution. No one
is above the law, not even the president.”
So, only 2 weeks
into a 4 year term and the new administration resembles the court of an old-fashioned
king or a dictator, with all the infighting and Steve Bannon, as the "Court Jester in cargo
pants".
A group of
volunteer lawyers, calling themselves Dulles
Justice (after their campaign to help travelers at Dulles airport in
Virginia), they hailed the decision on Saturday.
“This decision shuts down the executive
order immediately – shuts it down. That relief is immediate, happens right now.
That’s the bottom line.”
An immigration attorney,
Hailly Korman has stated. “For refugees
fleeing persecution or violence, it should mean we’ll be able to welcome them
to this great country. For now, this
should mean a safe return home for countless travelers from around the world,
from Legal Permanent Residents to visa holders.
The White House has already announced their intention to counter this
order with a request for an emergency stay. We, too, have no intention of
backing down.”
Chuck Schumer,
the leader of Senate Democrats criticized the president for his insults toward
a federal judge. ”Trump’s tweets”, Schumer said, show “a disdain for an independent judiciary that doesn’t always bend to his
wishes and a continued lack of respect for the constitution”.
A number of
Republicans have disagreed with the ban. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell
has deferred to the courts over whether the order is lawful, while House Speaker
Paul Ryan has even defended Trump’s order. “This
is not a Muslim ban. If it were, I would be against it,” Ryan told
reporters this week. But Ryan is definitely in the minority.
Senators John
McCain and Lindsey Graham have led a handful of dissenters in the party, noting
that close US allies, including the King of Jordan, have warned that the ban
will corrode their otherwise good relations.
However, as
one would expect, the Republican leader’s offices of McConnell and Ryan declined to
comment.
It must have become
obvious as to how most Americans felt. At many
major airports from Kennedy in New York, to LAX, to Atlanta, human rights attorneys were
camped out.
Camille
Mackler, of the New York Immigration Coalition, said uncertainty remained over
how to recover valid visas and how many people would start arriving in the
US. “We’re
tracking flights right now and working on our lists,” she said, “but we’re still not clear if people who had
their visas illegally cancelled will now have to re-apply or if their visas
will be re-issued automatically.”
Mackler said
her group was trying to get the message out to all the travelers affected by the ban
that they could now enter the US.
Donald Trump's own ignorance about his own order, pretty much says it all.
Copyright G.Ater 2017
Comments
Post a Comment