IS IT TIME THAT LAWMAKERS TOOK BACK SOME NUCLEAR POWER FROM THE PRESIDENT?
…The first atomic bomb called “The
Fat Man”
Per Donald Trump, “If we didn’t intend to ever use them
[nuclear weapons], why do we build them in the first place?”
If you are
looking for something that scares the “bejesus
out of you”, just think about this!
“When Trump takes office in
January, he will have sole authority over more than 7,000 nuclear warheads.
There is no failsafe. The whole point of US nuclear weapons control is to make
sure that the president, and only the president, can use them if he decides to
do so.”
Unfortunately,
the one sure way to keep a President Trump from being able to launch a nuclear
attack, under the system we’ve had in place since the Cold War, to avoid this
problem would have been to elect someone else.
That’s the only alternative.
Just look at
all the people that were concerned at the prospect of giving a real estate
mogul and reality TV star, the power to launch attacks that could or would kill
millions of innocent people. The reason
there is so much concern is that during the campaign, Donald Trump actually
asked this question, “If we didn’t intend
to ever use them [nuclear weapons], why did we design and build them in the
first place?” Trump apparently has
no concept of having nuclear weapons that are so devastating that it would
deter any other nation from using or developing them. Germany under Adolf Hitler in WWII was
working to develop the atomic bomb, but fortunately, the US beat them to it.
>>>
President Obama had said that Trump did not have the temperament to be in
charge of the nation’s nuclear codes.
>>>
Hillary Clinton said in a speech: “A man
you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons.”
>>>
Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) said he didn’t think he could be trusted with the
launch codes
>>>
Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) became the second US senator to hesitate when asked
whether she'd trust Donald Trump with the US nuclear arsenal.
But does the
president really have his finger on the ability to push the button to release
nuclear weapons?
Here’s the way
it actually works:
The procedure
for ordering a nuclear attack involves more than one person: The president
cannot literally press a button on his desk and start World War III. There is
no “nuclear button” at all.
Instead, the
US nuclear command-and-control system is bureaucratically and technically complex,
stretching out to encompass land-based missile silos, submarine-based ballistic
and cruise missiles, and nuclear weapons capable of being dropped from bombers.
This is known as the “Nuclear Triad”. Nuclear weapons that can be delivered from “land, sea or air”. (And don’t forget, Donald Trump did not know
what the “Nuclear Triad” was when he was asked in an election campaign
interview.)
The chain of
command requires that the president order the Secretary of Defense to carry out a launch; the secretary serves as
the conduit for implementation by the military.
There are
succession policies in place so that the procedure can be continued in the
event of the death or incapacitation of either the president or the Secretary
of Defense, or their designated successors.
Most of the
details of how a nuclear war could be started are classified, because an enemy
who knew enough about the system could come up with ways to complicate or
defeat it. But what is known is that an aide is always following the president,
carrying at least one large satchel (often two) known as the “nuclear football.” It reportedly contains information about
nuclear attack possibilities and how the president could verify his identity,
authenticate orders and communicate with the military about implementing them.
All year, the
prospect of giving this man the ability to launch attacks that would kill
millions of people was one of the main reasons his opponents argued against
electing him. Unfortunately, the voters
in three key rust-belt states didn’t listen to those reasons. Those three states gave Trump the Electoral
College, not the massive popular vote that went to Hillary.
The history of
how the only country to ever use nuclear weapons in a World War is interesting.
When the legal
framework for nuclear weapons was developed, the overall fear was not about an
irrational president (like a Donald
Trump), but it was concern about a potential trigger-happy general. The
Atomic Energy Act of 1946, which was passed with President Harry Truman’s
signature after nine months of acrimonious congressional hearings, firmly put
the power of the atomic bomb in the hands of the president and the civilian
components of the executive branch, not the military. It was a momentous and
controversial law, crafted in the months following the atomic bombings of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WWII, with an eye toward future nuclear standoffs
with the Soviet Union.
The members of
Congress who wrote the law, with the backing of the scientists who worked on
the original Manhattan Project, which
built the first atomic bomb, framed it explicitly as a question of who controls
the power to use nuclear weapons. The
question that was asked was: Is dropping
an atomic bomb a military act or a political one? If it is inherently
political, above and beyond a regular military tactic, then that power could
not be entrusted to the military. Ultimately, the president was supposed to be
a check against the Pentagon pushing to use nukes more often.
The
scientists’ fears were based on their experiences in WWII. Their work under the
Army Corps of Engineers and the Army Air Forces left them with a sour
taste: Generals, they had concluded, cared little about ethics, democracy or
international politics. Even during the war, some civilians involved with
atomic-bomb work feared that the military had become too eager to leave German
and Japanese cities in cinders with their carpet bombing. The then Secretary of
War, Henry Stimson, (Before it became the
Secretary of Defense) learned about the ruinous firebombing of Tokyo from
the press. He warned Truman that letting the military run the show might cause
the United States to “get the reputation
of outdoing Hitler in atrocities.”
He was correct.
This division
between military and civilian control over nuclear weapons has changed over the
years. In the late 1940s, US nuclear weapons would have their nuclear
components, the plutonium or uranium items that were needed to start nuclear
their reactions, they were inserted or removed as needed. The nuclear parts of
the atomic bombs were back then in the custody of the civilian Atomic Energy Commission, the precursor
to the present-day Energy Department, while the military controlled the
non-nuclear parts. The president had the power to transfer these items to the
military and order their use.
But by late in
the Eisenhower administration, more compact and complex weapons had been
developed, But their nuclear and
nonnuclear parts could not be separated. Fearing a Soviet sneak attack, which
could have had a ballistic missile reach the US mainland from the Soviet Union
in 30 minutes, President Eisenhower put the military in charge of most of the
US nuclear stockpile to streamline a possible response. Eisenhower also “pre-delegated” authority to the military
to use tactical nuclear weapons, but aimed at military facilities, not Soviet
cities, without getting specific presidential approval in certain
situations. Examples of that were if
Soviet tank columns started rolling into Germany. (Remember,
this was just before the Soviets built the Berlin Wall that separated the
communist East Germany from the democratic West Germany.)
Which by the
way, “Is the border “Wall” that Trump
wants to build between the US and Mexico, just another up-dated version of the
“Berlin Wall”?
Fears of
low-level commanders setting off nuclear conflicts during the tensions of the
early 1960s persuaded President John F. Kennedy to dial back some of this
potential action. Miscommunications
during the Cuban missile crisis had almost led to the use of nuclear weapons by
both US and Soviet troops in Cuba, and US weapons stationed abroad, such as the
Jupiter missiles in Turkey. These
nuclear missiles could have been used by any army that seized their control.
There were also lingering concerns about “Dr.
Strangelove” type rogue generals which ideas were sparked by the then
popular US movie. The head of the Strategic Air Command, Gen. Thomas Power at
the time, was a frightening proponent of preemptive nuclear war.
Similar
concerns within the upper reaches of the Kennedy administration led to a push
for technologies to “lock” the
nuclear weapons and prevent their use without some kind of codes or
authorization. Some early versions were as primitive as using standard
combination locks like you now use on your bicycles or school lockers. Later versions were developed with complex
electro-mechanical systems that could physically disable a weapon if it were
tampered with or if the wrong code was entered too many times.
Eventually,
the brass adopted the idea that, when it came to nuclear matters, they were at
the beck and call of the president. It was not the generals’ responsibility to
make the order; it was their responsibility instead to carry it out. That’s where it stands today…..but now that
we have Donald Trump at the helm….well…?
The people who
set up the current command-and-control system did believe there was a check in
place. It was our “elections”. If you don’t want an insane president to have nuclear
weapons, then don’t put an insane one in office.
Now this
wasn’t much of a check, as even rational presidents have bad days and even
high-functioning people succumb to mental illness or substance abuse.
But no one
imagined someone like a Donald Trump actually being elected, and we know that
Trump likes to be “unpredictable”. But that doesn’t work so well if you believe
in diplomacy.
Congress ceded
considerable amounts of power to the presidency in 1946. Now, seventy years later, maybe it is time
that the lawmakers took some of that power back….?
Copyright G.Ater 2016
Comments
Post a Comment