TRUMP WANTS TO KEEP PARTS OF OBAMACARE…GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!
…Apparently, this is where the
Republicans want Americans to receive their health care.
Republicans have always hated
single-payer, “Medicare-for-All” insurance ideas.
As I have been
stating for almost 4 years, all those including the current President Elect Trump that have said that they want to repeal Obamacare, they do not understand how the insurance business
works. And this is especially true for
those that are now saying that they want to repeal Obamacare, but want to keep some of Obamacare’s features such as not having a “pre-existing condition clause” and the ability to keep the kids on
the parent’s policy.
The reason
that the current Obamacare requires
everybody to buy some level of insurance is mainly because of its pre-existing
clause issue. I will try to explain the
reason that repealing it, while keeping some of its features is easier said than
done.
For instance,
if you are young and healthy, you probably would not consider buying any health
insurance. But if you came down with a medical
problem, or if your child was born with a tumor and there were no pre-existing
condition clause, you could then call the insurance company and demand low-cost
insurance coverage for your child. That
a $200,000 tumor issue that could then be totally or partially covered.
When Obamacare was first approved, remember,
it was originally a Republican idea that started out as Romneycare. That was when Mitt Romney successfully
introduced it while being the Governor of Massachusetts. It was the governor’s way of offering health
insurance for their state’s citizens, without offering Medicare for All, a single-payer insurance idea which the
Republicans have always hated.
When the law
says insurance companies can’t discriminate on the basis of pre-existing
conditions, surely what it means is that they have to charge roughly the same
price for all health insurance, irrespective of your pre-existing medical
condition. In the language of insurance, that’s a term called “guaranteed issue at community rates.”
Unfortunately,
in those states that have tried “guaranteed
issues at community rates”, the insurance markets have all eventually died.
That’s because, if you guarantee everyone the right to buy health insurance at
community rates, then some consumers will end up gaming the system. As
previously stated, the young and healthy ones won’t buy any health insurance at
all—they’ll go without until they are diagnosed with diabetes or a brain tumor
or they get hit by a truck. And when that happens, they will immediately
call up the insurance company and exercise their right to buy health insurance
at the low community rate, irrespective of their medical condition. It won’t be
long before the insurance companies begin losing a ton of money and are then forced
to either raise premiums through the roof or stop writing policies altogether.
So, in order
to fix this, how do you prevent that kind of gaming of the system by
consumers?
Well, you just
require that everyone buy at least some minimal level of insurance at the
beginning of every year, so they can’t buy insurance only after they get sick.
That’s called an” individual mandate.”
But because you can’t expect all the poor people to pay $1,000 a month, they
will require subsidies to keep their out-of-pocket costs down to something like
only 10% of their income. To pay for those subsidies, a new tax is always
required.
The point is,
that Trump and some others say they want to keep a couple of the good parts of Obamacare.
But if you repeal Obamacare,
you would have to scrap guaranteed issue, and scrap community ratings, and
scrap the individual mandate and scrap the subsidies as the Republicans propose. Then you end up where the country was back in
2008, with a market system that inevitably gives way to an insurance spiral
upward in which steadily rising premiums that cause a steadily rising
percentage of Americans that can’t afford their health care.
In other
words, sorry Donald, and sorry to any others that want to keep parts of Obamacare. It’s either you have a single-payer Medicare for all, or you have Obamacare, but you can’t just divvy it
up and have it work in the long run.
So let’s
review. To guarantee that people with pre-existing conditions can get
affordable health insurance, you need to have rules requiring “guaranteed issue and community rating”.
To keep insurance companies in business because of “guaranteed issue and community rating”, you need to have the “individual mandate”. And because
poor people can’t afford health insurance, you need government subsidies. If
you combine all three, what you have in a nutshell is today called ... Obamacare. It’s that, or it’s single payer, or it’s
nothing.
The point is
that you can’t have all the good parts of a socialized system with universal
coverage at affordable prices without the freedom-reducing mandates and
regulations and large doses of subsidies from some people to other people. As the old saying goes, you can’t there from
here without “paying the piper”.
Trump and others are trying to sell the false promise of
better quality health care at lower cost with fewer regulations and lower
taxes. Anyone who says this is peddling a
sack of pure manure.
There have
been many ideas presented to help fix Obamacare’s
problems, but the Republicans always ignored those ideas saying all they want
is to repeal and replace Obamacare. But they never get around to offering a
workable replacement program. All we
ever hear is “repeal”, but we never
hear what it would be replaced with….? The
explanation I gave you is why that is the case.
Obamacare was a GOP idea, and there hasn’t been any
workable ideas from the conservatives since they came up with the original Romneycare.
My point is
that if they actually go forward and repeal Obamacare,
it will take health care away from 20 million Americans. Oh, some may find other insurance sources,
but it’s pretty obvious the majority of those people will then once again go without health
care.
Now, those people will either just die,
or they will then become a ward of their state.
The tax paying Americans will then be responsible for their
healthcare. These uninsured Americans
will then get their very expensive health care through their visits to the
local hospital emergency rooms. That is
the most expensive way to distribute health care.
And that’s the
way it was, long before there was Obamacare.
Remember back when
I agreed with all that talk saying that if you vote for Trump it would be a
vote for going backwards, not forwards?
Well, as to
health care, I rest my case.
Copyright G.Ater 2016
Comments
Post a Comment