CARLY FIORINA RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT OFFENDS ME
Regardless of her gender, Carly is
still not qualified to run for president.
Being that I
have lived all of my business life in Silicon Valley, and being that
Hewlett-Packard was a major client of mine while working with multiple
corporations, and while I lived through Carly Fiorina’s reign as the H-P CEO, I
just had to write about her now being a Republican presidential candidate.
My first
comment is that, I am offended by Carly Fiorina’s candidacy.
My offense is
not because she is a female or a Republican, it’s that she is not qualified to
run as a presidential candidate.
And by the
way, I’m also offended by Dr. Ben Carson candidacy, as I was about the 2012 Pizza
Man, Herman Cain, and the millionaire Donald Trump.
Being an
executive in business has little if anything to do with being qualified to be
the Commander-in-Chief of the greatest nation on earth.
And in Carly’s
case, being bad in business is even worse, especially after losing your one bid
for elective office by a full 10 points in what was a good year for
Republicans.
Carly actually
had a seriously failed business career and has had no political career whatsoever. As one writer said about Carly, “It is the height of chutzpah to imagine that
she is remotely qualified to be president. Or, since it’s the more likely
endgame, for vice president either.”
As the H-P
CEO, she still constantly talks about how the company grew. Oh, it grew alright. Under Fiorina’s tenure from 1999 to 2005, all
the H-P growth was due to an ill-advised merger with Compaq that caused 30,000
employees to lose their jobs and that cost H-P shareholders $24 billion and bought them a
computer business that diluted the value of H-P’s high-margin printer
business. “This was a big bet that didn’t pay off, that didn’t even come close to
attaining what Fiorina and H-P’s board said was in store,” Carol Loomis
concluded in a devastating Fortune
magazine piece. As Yahoo News had stated, “H-P
stock fell by more than half during Fiorina’s tenure, while its technology
cohorts performed much better.”
I always
question any candidate who seeks the presidency without any government
experience. Business management demands
different skills from politics and the American presidency is no place for
on-the-job training. Just look at the George W. Bush experiment.
Even if you
give Carly credit for her past business experience, she has made some serious
gaffes in her dealings with being a high-paid, high-tech advisor to other
political candidates.
During the
2008 presidential campaign, she was an advisor on technology to the Republican
presidential candidate, John McCain. In that position, Carly actual stated to the
media that the vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin and the GOP presidential nominee himself, “weren’t fit to run a company”.
Now, forget
that what she said was probably totally true.
This was her personal customer-client and her party’s choice for running for
US president.
I would say
that Ms. Fiorina has another issue in her inability for making the appropriate
call on when and what to say to the media.
So, there I’ve
said my piece on where I fall in Ms. Fiorina’s current run for the US
presidency.
Copyright G. Ater 2015
Comments
Post a Comment