VIOLENCE IN TODAY’S AMERICA
…The battle in the streets of
Ferguson
Will the issues from Ferguson,
Missouri, become the beginning of the next decade of American Civil Rights conflicts?
I guess it was
inevitable that what is going on in Ferguson, Missouri, was eventually going to happen
somewhere in the US.
Many news followers might have expected it to occur in an area as it did in the Watts area of Los Angeles in 1965, or at the WTO riots in Seattle in 1999. You know, these followers have expected this kind of violence in a major city like a New York City. Or any big city with a past history of issues with a large, mostly white police force.
Many news followers might have expected it to occur in an area as it did in the Watts area of Los Angeles in 1965, or at the WTO riots in Seattle in 1999. You know, these followers have expected this kind of violence in a major city like a New York City. Or any big city with a past history of issues with a large, mostly white police force.
The reality is,
that the circumstances of what is happening in these suburbs of St. Louis is what is going all over
the US. That being, wherever there was once an abundance of reasonably good paying
manufacturing jobs near or within a major US city.
Oakland,
California, is another area that has been having these issues of local violence
in their African American communities, as are many cities in that area previously known as the nation’s “Rust Belt”. This is an area that begins in central New York and
traverses to the west through Pennsylvania,
West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana,
and the Lower Peninsula of Michigan,
ending in northern Illinois and eastern Wisconsin. This area was for decades an
major economic region of the United States concentrated in these dominant
industrial manufacturing states.
Over the years, more and more manufacturing jobs have either exited the nation
for low-wage countries such as Taiwan, Vietnam, Thailand, China and So. Korea,
or many of those jobs have been replaced by automation and industrial robots. This situation has since left a number of
those citizens, those holding only a high school diploma or less, with fewer places
to work and/or live.
During the past decades, as major US cities were declining in prestige and
manufacturing importance, those minorities that did still have jobs, they were working to remove
themselves from the crime ridden inner cities. Their obvious goals became the finding of new homes in
the outer suburbs. This is where these many
families of very mixed races and heritages, were all striving to find
homes with good schools for raising their kids.
In small suburb towns, such as Ferguson, back in the 1960’s, Ferguson’s
population was 87% white. But as these
diverse families began migrating out to the “burbs”, the white families were also starting to migrating even
further away from the big cities. These
white families were starting new communities in areas that were previously
grasslands, orchards and farm lands.
The end result is that we now have the St Louis suburb town of Ferguson, a community, that is today, 67% African Americans, but with only 6% of the police
force being non-white. There are no
blacks on the local school board, a white mayor, and only one black individual
recently elected to the town council. In addition, of those in Ferguson that are stopped or questioned on the street by the Ferguson police, over 87% are African American.
As has been shown so many times, when those running or policing a
community does not resemble those that actually live in the community,
something will eventually have to give.
In this case, the shooting of an un-armed teenager, 6 or more times, by a white police officer, this was obviously not going to go down without some serious response from the local African American population.
In this case, the shooting of an un-armed teenager, 6 or more times, by a white police officer, this was obviously not going to go down without some serious response from the local African American population.
But, what is causing so much of a national issue of the shooting of an
African American teenager, is not just that a black teenager was shot and killed. It was how that shooting was and is being handled and all
the mistakes that have been made by the local officials.
Here is a short chronology of what has occurred that shows just how poorly
the Ferguson Police, the St.
Louis County Police and the Governor of Missouri have handled the teenager's shooting and its subsequent
follow-on issues:
·
After the actual shooting, none of
the three individuals that had witnessed the shooting in broad daylight were
interviewed on that same day. Only the
statements of what had occurred, that were made by the officer involved, which were referenced by the local
police captain.
·
The unarmed victim, Michael Brown, was left lying in the
street for hours after being shot dead. In the Summer heat, this would obviously have very negative effects for the subsequent autopsies.
·
After the local police initially went totally
overboard with their heavy military police force in dealing with the peaceful
protestors with tear gas and smoke bombs, the Missouri Governor brought in a
black captain of the Missouri Highway Patrol to take control. (The
Capt. had also been raised in the town of Ferguson.)
…The protestors in Ferguson, MO.
·
The Highway Patrol Capt. then got rid of
the police military attire and equipment and he succeeded in getting the local crowds settled
down for one night.
·
In subsequent nights, after dark,
outsiders started showing up looting, shooting, throwing Molotov Cocktails and generally raising hell, (That activity continues to occur now, 10 days after the shooting.) It also forced the
Highway Patrol Captain to go back to using tear gas, smoke bombs and crowd control tactics after
dark.
·
The governor had called for a
12:00AM curfew. But the trouble was starting well before the curfew and mainly after the peaceful protestors had headed
for home. The Governor later removed the curfew.
·
The shooting officer, Darren Wilson, his name was withheld and
not announced for days.
·
The prosecutor for St. Louis County has refused to release
any information regarding the 1st autopsy of the victim, including how many shot
were fired.
·
When the Ferguson police captain
finally released the name of the officer involved, he also released a video
that apparently showed Michael Brown shop-lifting a package of small cigars
from a local convenience store. The
implication was that Mr. Brown had been pursued due to his shop lifting. But it turned out to just be a smear against the dead
teenager’s reputation. The truth was
that the shooting officer involved did not know about the shop lifted cigars.
·
There is still no explanation why an
unarmed black teenager, wearing shorts, tee-shirt and flip-flops, had to die from six
shots from a white police officer as he was apparently in the process of giving up.
·
President Obama has since gotten the US Attorney General and the FBI involved and has called for a separate investigation and a 3rd
autopsy by the US Justice Department.
·
In addition, the three witnesses
that were finally interviewed, they have all stated that the teenage had his hands up and
was surrendering when he was shot multiple times.
·
According to the independent autopsy
report which had been ordered by Michael Brown’s parents, their 6’4” son was shot in the top
of his head as his hands were up and he was going down. One could only be shot in the top of his head
if he were bending over or going down.
This also coincides with the statements from the three independent eye witness accounts.
·
As of today, the shooting officer has not
been arrested or charged, even though the officials already know that the
victim was unarmed and was shot multiple times. The officer did not wrestle with the victim and the
victim was some feet away from the officer when he was shot.
…The militarization of Ferguson’s
Police Dept.
·
The governor has now called in the Missouri
National Guard to patrol the Ferguson police command center, and he is not insisting that the
investigation become more transparent to the public.
·
President Obama is being updated
regularly by the US Attorney General, and the president has commented multiple times on the
issues going on in Ferguson.
This is an on-going case and it seems to have the general attention of the
American public. It is obvious that many
in the black community are looking at Ferguson and they are saying to
themselves, “So what’s new? Versions of this are what goes down in my town all the
time.”
This could easily become the beginning of another decade of Civil Rights
issues that could engulf this nation as they did in the 1960’s and 70’s.
Copyright G.Ater 2014
Comments
Post a Comment