GOP HAWK'S COMMENTS OF OBAMA BEING WEAK...FOR THE BIRDS
…Conservative Op-Ed writer, Marc
Thiessen.
I guess I
shouldn’t expect anything different from someone that was a speech writer for George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld, but Mr. Marc
A. Thiessen, the conservative op-ed writer for the Washington Post is being appropriately a war-monger, just like many
of his other conservative mouth pieces.
Mr. Thiessen
is currently following and using the conservative “talking points”, saying that the president is being, “tepid and only showing inaction” toward
Russia’s Vladimir Putin.
Even though he
mouths these words, which are curiously, exactly the same words that are being
used by the other congressional hawks such as Senators; John McCain and Lindsay
Graham, as well as 40+ GOP House Representatives and a host of Fox News Hosts.
Isn’t it interesting that these people are able to “channel” each other so well, that that are able to all use exactly the same words and even with the same phrasing. Talk about the blind leading the blind, or in this case, the blind leading all the lemmings.
Isn’t it interesting that these people are able to “channel” each other so well, that that are able to all use exactly the same words and even with the same phrasing. Talk about the blind leading the blind, or in this case, the blind leading all the lemmings.
Any time any
one of these individuals gets a real thought of their own, that particular individual
will then be quickly thrown out of their exclusive lemmings club.
Now, even
though Mr. Thiessen has this to say about the current president, at the same
time he spent about 75% of his latest column in talking-up Ms. Samantha Power, the current US
Ambassador to the United Nations.
It is amazing
how much he is impressed with what Ms. Power had to say about the Russian
leader, and what she was saying to the UN
General Assembly.
This is also
where Thiessen says that President Obama only mentioned Putin once in his initial
comments about the shooting down of the Malaysian plane in the Ukraine.
But he totally
showered compliments on Ms. Power when he quoted her saying she, “…delivered a searing indictment of Russia to
the U.N. Security Council, laying responsibility for this barbarous act exactly
where it belongs — at Putin’s feet. ‘Time after time, President Putin has
committed to working towards dialogue and peace,’ Power declared, ‘And every
single time, he has broken that commitment.’
Power told the Security Council that the
plane was likely shot down by an SA-11 missile and that ‘it is unlikely that
the separatists could effectively operate the system without . . . technical
assistance from Russian personnel in operating the systems.’
He then added
that she said that, “…Secretary of State
John Kerry said Sunday that Russia had in fact trained the separatists in how
to use the missile, while Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Pentagon spokesman, went
even further, raising the possibility that the Russian military had actually
fired the missile.”
Thiessen just
couldn’t stop himself when he continued with, “Power also accused Putin of providing separatists with tanks, armored
vehicles, rocket launchers, man-portable air defense systems, mines and grenades
— noting that many weapons captured by Ukrainian forces included “accompanying
documentation verifying the Russian origin. Power charged Putin with holding
Ukrainian prisoners in Russia on behalf of separatists. She cited recent
shoot-downs in Ukrainian airspace of a Ukrainian Air Force cargo plane and a
Ukrainian fighter jet and said the Ukrainian government believes “that these
planes were fired on from Russian territory.”
And she declared of the downing of Flight 17:
‘We have a duty to each and every one of those individuals, their families and
their countries to determine why that jet fell out of the sky and to hold the
perpetrators accountable. . . . This appalling attack occurred in the context
of a crisis and has been fueled by Russian support for separatists . . . and by
the Russian failure to follow through on its commitments and by its failure to
adhere to the fundamental principles of the U.N. Charter. . . . This war can be
ended. Russia can end this war. Russia must end this war.’…… Wow.’ ”
This man was
showing so much support for Ms. Power, I think that for a while, he had
forgotten that she wasn’t a conservative Republican and to whom Ms. Power
actually reports.
Throughout Mr.
Thiessen’s column, you would have thought he was writing a thoughtful and
sincere article about a fellow American conservative working at the United Nations.
This writer usually
only respects the “Dick Cheney types”
of leaders that only talk the bluster of war and of killing. This conservative, as with most Republican
politicians, doesn’t seem to understand
it’s not a good idea for the most powerful man in the world, to directly use
the kind of language and comments that is best offered to the public by the
world leader’s subordinates.
It’s a whole
lot different for a UN Ambassador to
be talking about accusing another major world leader of heinous crimes, versus
having those words and insinuations coming out of the other world leader’s actual
mouth.
Doesn’t this
great speech writer of a previous US president know that these statements by
Ms. Power were all staged for having it made crystal clear to Mr. Putin, as to exactly
what President Obama feels about Mr’ Putin’s actions, but to do it through his
UN surrogate…? This approach allows for
the information to be communicated to Putin and the world without directly
challenging Putin like making a challenge for a duel. Thiessen obviously doesn’t understand that
this is not the "dueling times of Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr".
I find it very
telling that a presidential speech writer really didn’t see that this allowed
the president, through the world stage of the United Nations, to say to the world that , “Mr. Putin, we know what you are doing and we are telling it all to the
world.”
In saying all
those wonderful things he had to say about what Ms. Power was saying, Thiessen
was actually complimenting the president for having it said directly to Putin
and the Russian people.
Thiessen was
so dense, he even went on to say, “Our
U.N. ambassador is sounding like Ronald Reagan while our president is sounding
like Jimmy Carter. It seems Obama has become so accustomed to projecting
weakness that he can’t even seem to muster a strongly worded statement.”
Apparently Mr. Thiessen, you
aren’t aware that all of the UN Ambassador’s statements such as this have
to be cleared through the White House,
and I don’t mean by a lower-level WH
flunkie. I mean the man at the top.
Mr. Thiessen
then stated, “Inaction has consequences.
If Obama does nothing in the face of Putin’s actions, our inaction could have
consequences far from Ukraine.” Just
as the wrong knee-jerk action could be even worse.
By the way,
just what-the-hell kind of action does Mr. Thiessen want?
He is sounding
just like all the McCain’s, Graham’s and other GOP hawks and all those talking-heads on Fox News.
Haven’t these
guys got this country into enough very expensive wars? Oh I forgot, Thiessen worked for Dubya Bush
and Dick Cheney....that explains it all.
I’m not saying
that we shouldn’t stand up for what’s right, but you don’t look at every
problem as a nail, and the US as the obvious hammer.
Mr. Thiessen
needs to remember, years ago, when the Korean Airliner was blown out of the
sky, Ronald Reagan did not immediately declare war on Russia (In fact, it took Reagan 4 days to even say anything at all.), and neither will Obama
today. There are better ways to deal
with Putin.
Remember, Putin
is the real bully here, not Obama and the US.
Copyright G.Ater 2014
Comments
Post a Comment