ONCE AGAIN, OBAMA WAS PLAYING CHESS, WHILE TRUMP PLAYS CHECKERS
…Apple manufacturing operation in
China
The TPP was more about S.E. Asian countries
following US rules, not China’s, for manufacturing, and intellectual
property.
OK, it’s time
for “President Falsehood” to stop
selling his jobs programs by saying that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was such a bad trade deal.
As you may
recall, former President Obama was many times found to be playing chess, while
his opposition was playing checkers. Obama was a strategic thinker, Trump has no idea of what "strategy" even means.
The TPP agreement was never meant as a great
jobs program that would greatly increase the American economy. That was never the reason for pursuing such
an agreement.
Now that Trump
is at the helm of the country, he doesn’t even understand that in one of his
very first actions as the chief executive, he just killed the program that had
little to do with jobs or our economy. It was instead a geopolitical move that
would have put an American foot firmly in China’s back yard.
With Trump’s
knee-jerk move to pull the US out of the TPP,
he just basically forfeited to communist China the next global area of
anticipated major economic growth.
According to The US International Trade Commission,
the estimates were that the TPP would
only have raised America’s inflation-adjusted incomes only 0.23% between now
and 2032. That’s pretty close to zero.
But the TPP was never about increasing our GDP or for creating jobs or reducing
tariffs.
The chess game
of the TPP was about having other
countries follow US rules for patents and intellectual property. It was for raising prices for Asian consumers
and yes, some profits for American companies. In all likelihood, it wouldn't
change our jobs picture very much at all.
The TPP was about the US being in China’s
backyard, and about writing the trade rules so China couldn't. Granted it would not deal with keeping
different countries from manipulating the value of their currancy, which is what
all the US manufacturers would have wanted.
But then again, that was not the purpose of the agreement.
This deal was designed for setting up a system to promote
prosperity abroad so fragile democracies could resist Communist China’s pressures. As of today, due to Trump’s actions, China
now has an open field to take all those small countries that offer all their
low-cost wages, and to put pressure on them to accept China’s way of developing
their economies.
Had the US not
taken a similar approach for the rebuilding of Western Europe after WWII, the
then Soviet Union might have taken over some those economies. Even after the Berlin Wall came down,
European markets were still way off from being totally open. But by the US making separate deals with the
different western European countries, it not only helped open up their markets,
it also rewarded those same countries for reforming their economies under US directions.
Now, don’t get me wrong. The US has more than once gotten itself into
serious trouble by making poor trade deals.
We are all aware of the “giant sucking sound” we heard from all the jobs that
moved south of the border due to Bill Clinton’s NAFTA agreement. And who
could forget when President George W. Bush granted China, Permanent Normal Trade Relations status in 2000. That alone really did give US companies the go-ahead
they needed for shifting their production to China on a massive
scale. This was because
all those US manufacturers no longer had to worry about the risk of
foreign tariffs rising their manufacturing costs.
Oh yes, the US has “screwed the pooch” more than once with making bad trade deals. But now, we’ll never know if Obama’s chess
game was as good of an idea as was expected.
It is important
to understand that with a president like Donald Trump, the US won’t even
try to lead on trade anymore. Trump doesn't see trade deals as a way to win
friendly nations and to influence their people.
Trump wants deals for winning US manufacturing jobs, but mainly for increasing
his personal approval ratings.
Trump has yet to understand that even if he is successful at getting those manufacturing jobs back in the US, those jobs have changed. The factories that once required 3000 workers, are all now automated and only need 30 to 300 employees.
By pulling out
of the TPP, it just leaves a very wide
opening for other countries like China to negotiate where the US now isn’t going to
be. The risk is that more globalization,
which is inevitable, will not be proceeding on US terms or even with US
values. And there’s an even greater
danger: New trade deals might not help
that much, but unraveling the old ones could seriously hurt.
In the end,
the US won't have the luxury of wondering whose globalization we might have
influenced…? The answer will probably be
that the US will have influenced no one’s economies, and then the whole world
will just be that much poorer for it.
Copyright G.Ater 2017
Comments
Post a Comment