IF OBAMA IS A DICTATOR, AS STATED BY THE GOP, HE’S VERY LOUSY AT IT
…Darrell Issa, just one of the
Republican Chairmen that continually lies about President Obama
The GOP continually proves that
they will change their core beliefs at the drop of a hat.
This latest
bizarre attitude of the president being called a dictator and the idea that a
president can be sued for using his “Executive
Orders” is getting way out of hand.
It would be funny if it wasn’t becoming so prevalent within the GOP and their many, not-so-bright
congresspersons.
Where this
idea was originally developed was probably in the mind of the
Republican’s chief strategists and “Talking-Points”
brainiac, Mr. Frank Luntz. It definitely appears as another brainless
idea that Luntz would develop and support.
I’m sure Luntz
must also be one of the ones that changed the focus of the Republicans that for
decades preached against “activist judges”. In fact, this week the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.)
proclaimed, “Unfortunately, the courts
have been reluctant to exercise their constitutionally conferred power.” In this case, the chairman was complaining
that the judges were not, “checking the
president’s overreach” in the use of his Executive Orders. The
chairman even complained that, “the
federal courts have read their own powers much more narrowly than they should”.
Once again,
the Republicans have changed a core beliefs just to fit within their latest, “hot-off-the-press” goals.
Of course, no
Republican will discuss the fact that Dubya
Bush used His Executive Orders 291 times versus Obama’s so far, 168 orders. In fact, Obama has used his Executive Orders
fewer times than any president going back to Grover Cleveland. He isn’t even close, and probably won’t pass
Clinton’s 364 Executive Orders and for sure, Reagan’s 381, so where is all this “acting
like a dictator” B.S. coming from anyway.
As usual with the GOP, “what’s good for the goose is never good for
the gander”, especially if the gander is a Democrat.
Somebody in
the D.C. press pool has now referred to this Republican and Fox News, “dictator” manifestation as the far
right’s Obama Derangement Syndrome:
i.e.: The president’s opponents are so
determined to thwart him that they will reverse long-held views if they believe
that doing so will weaken his stature.
This whole
issue is seriously becoming totally bizarre.
How far it’s gone was recently described by Dana Milbank of the Washington
Post: “Republicans have, for example,
long deplored the filing of “frivolous lawsuits.” But at Wednesday’s hearings,
they were contemplating legislation that would authorize the Chamber of
Congress to file lawsuits against President Obama — even though legal experts,
including one of the Republican committee members’ own witnesses, have said the
efforts would fail. After law professor Elizabeth Price Foley presented the
panel with ‘a road map of how the House can establish standing to sue the
president,’ the committee’s ranking Democrat, John Conyers (D-Mich.), pointed
out that earlier this month she had penned an article for the Daily Caller
titled, ‘Why, not even Congress can sue the administration over
unconstitutional executive actions.”
Foley only replied, ‘I did not pick that title.’ “
What Ms. Price
actually wrote in her article was “Congress
probably can’t sue the president. The Supreme Court has severely restricted
so-called ‘congressional standing,’ creating a presumption against allowing
members of Congress to sue the president merely because he fails to faithfully
execute its laws.”
I don’t know
how long it will last, but at least the Republicans have for now stopped
talking as much about the “I” word,
for “Impeachment”, and have moved
more to the “S” word for “Suing” the president. Every Republican on the hill knows this is
all a bunch of bunk, but they also know their devout and unsophisticated Fox
& Co. followers don’t know that this is all for show. You all know, that these are the same crazy followers with
the demonstration signs against Obamacare
that were saying, “KEEP YOUR GOVERNMENT HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE!”
Just where in the world do
they think their Medicare comes from?
These
individuals will believe anything that Fox or the Duck Dynasty crowd present to them on the all mighty TV tube.
But whether
it’s impeachment or suing, neither is a practical idea because the courts have
long ago refused to settle such disputes between the elected branches.
Even though
this is true, here are some of the exaggerated statements that Mr. Milbank also
listed to demonstrate that the Republicans have no shame in their trying to
fool their constituents about the president and his actions as the Chief
Executive:
·
“President Obama’s actions have pushed
executive power beyond all limits and created what has been characterized as an
uber-presidency,” Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) stated.
·
“We have witnessed an unparalleled use of
executive power,” said Rep. Jim Gerlach (R-Pa.).
·
Rep. Tom Rice
(R-S.C.) accused Obama of “Trampling our
Constitution and our very freedom.”
·
Rep. Diane
Black (R-Tenn.) said that, “This
administration’s lawlessness included the appointment of an illegal alien
lobbyist as an immigration official. (Total B.S.)
·
Rep. Steve
King (R-Iowa) put it Wednesday, “[Impeachment
this way] is an impractical tool, as long as we have Harry Reid as a shield in
the Senate.”
What is
ridiculous is that Republicans claim they are concerned about abuses of power
by Obama even though they are relatively minor compared to those undertaken by
George W. Bush. As an example, Obama has not taken the
country into useless expensive foreign wars that also cost thousands of
innocent lives.
At a
Wednesday’s hearing, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) slammed his hand on the table
yelling, “This is not a laughing matter,”
as Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) had been laughing at Gutierrez who was
defending the legality of Obama’s immigration policy. Issa did immediately stop laughing, being
the hearing’s chair, he cut off Gutierrez from further comment. Another typical Chairman Issa movement.
The
Republicans and the hearing’s witnesses filled three hours with accusations and
wild hypotheticals of: “Tyranny.”
“Dangerous and scary moment.” “Imperial presidency.” “Magisterial power.”
“Effectively having a monarch.” “Alarming.” “Constitutional tipping point.”
“Reeks of arrogance and conceit.”
All amazing and astounding comments, and they never give examples to
support these accusations . (I hope all those wild accusations relieved them
of all that gas!)
Mr. Milbank’s
final comment sums up the ridiculousness of the GOP’s situation when he wrote, “ … one crucial difference: You can’t file a frivolous lawsuit against a
dictator.”
Copyright G.Ater 2014
Comments
Post a Comment