A DECISION FOR SUPPORTING HOBBY LOBBY COULD BE THE BEGINNING OF A VERY “SLIPPERY SLOPE”
…The most activist US Supreme Court
in decades.
The Robert’s Court will now have
another opportunity to rule in support of US corporations.
OK, let’s
break down the pro & cons of the Hobby
Lobby case now being argued in the US Supreme Court.
Here’s the
case. Among the Affordable Care Act’s thousands of pages is a requirement that
companies with more than 50 employees must provide coverage for certain medical
services. If they fail to do this they will
face severe financial penalties. These mandated services include methods
of contraception that prevent the implantation of a fertilized egg. To some people, this means the destroying of
a life. Obamacare would thus force some business owners to operate their
businesses in a way that might violate their deeply held religious principles.
The Oklahoma
City-based crafts retail chain Hobby
Lobby has filed a lawsuit claiming the Affordable
Care Act's mandate to cover the costs of the morning-after pill for
employees is forcing the company's owners "to violate their deeply held religious beliefs under threat of heavy
fines, penalties and lawsuits." Religious supporters and faith-based
organizations may agree with the self-described "biblically-based” company’s complaint, but the lawsuit has also sparked
a backlash against Hobby Lobby.
As of this
week, a petition to boycott Hobby Lobby
has now reached more than 70,000 signatures, according to a representative from
Ultraviolet, an activist group
fighting for women's rights. Likewise, the boycott has inspired a negative Tumblr blog and other social network
boycotts against Hobby Lobby crafts. A Facebook
group is calling for a general boycott of Hobby
Lobby, as well as some Flickr
user’s posts against the crafts company.
According to
the lawsuit, Hobby Lobby, would
stand to lose $1.3 million daily in
fines if it does not provide the required contraception coverage.
But the
company does have its supporters. Many fans have praised the company on its Facebook page with posts reading, “I support Hobby Lobby,” while a separate
“Boycott the boycotters of Hobby Lobby”
page garnered around 213 “likes” just
18 hours after it was made.
As to the
court’s position, if you judge the Robert’s
Court by its past history, (i.e. the
Citizens-United Case), the Robert’s Supreme Court believes that a
corporation is a person, that its money is its “free speech” and for the most part, all corporations should get
whatever they want.
If corporations
are found to be able to claim "religious
liberty", as the 4 conservatives on the court will probably agree to,
then it will probably once again take Justice Kennedy to be the swing vote. But that may also be a stretch for him. Hopefully, he will agree that corporations
are the very definition of being, "soulless",
but as to that situation, only time will tell.
If Hobby Lobby wins, then corporations could also be able to refuse to serve gay people on the grounds of religious liberty. If Hobby Lobby refuses to serve gay people, then what about people of other religions such as the Muslims, Jews or the Mormons? For the highest court to decide in favor of Hobby Lobby could be the beginning of a very “slippery slope”.
If Hobby Lobby wins, then corporations could also be able to refuse to serve gay people on the grounds of religious liberty. If Hobby Lobby refuses to serve gay people, then what about people of other religions such as the Muslims, Jews or the Mormons? For the highest court to decide in favor of Hobby Lobby could be the beginning of a very “slippery slope”.
The US Supreme
Court has already said that corporations are people. Apparently, this time they
are going to decide if corporations can now be “religiously intolerant” people.
Stay tuned for
the results on this one.
Copyright G.Ater 2014
Comments
Post a Comment