TRUMP CALLS PEOPLE MAGAZINE’S, NATASHA STOYNOFF A ‘LIAR'

…The caricature of  a sexual assaulter…?

 

Imagine Trump having to answer questions about his on-going conduct toward women…..under oath.

 

I am going to write something about Ms. Clinton’s political opposition where up to now, I have only barely mentioned in previous articles.

 

I have decided to write what I've learned about Trump’s overall mistreatment of women that has occurred throughout most of his adult life.

 

The decision to do this occurred when I read the headline: “TRUMP MOCKS SEXUAL ASSAULT ACCUSERS: CALLS PEOPLE’S NATASHA STOYNOFF A ‘LIAR’ “

 

After the Access Hollywood tape came to our attention, and during the 2^nd debate, Trump claimed that his taped boasting about grabbing women without consent was just that, “ all talk, no action”. However, in the 10 days before the third debate, nine women came forward with multiple stories to dispute that statement (As of this writing that number of women coming forward is now 11.)

 

In the 3^rd and final debate, the FOX moderator, Chris Wallace even posed the question: “Why would so many different women from so many different circumstances over so many different years . . . all make up these stories?”

 

Trump’s response was as usual, a layer of total dishonesty and outright lies.  Some even say it was an example of his bizaare conspiracy theories and his total blame-shifting. 

 

First he totally lied when he said, “Those stories have been largely debunked.”  Not only was that false, additional conformation of his sexual assaults has since emerged.  Then he repeatedly said “Lies, I did not say that,” as Trump was insisting three times after Hillary Clinton had said that part of Trump’s argument was that the women weren’t attractive enough to merit his unwanted attention.

The tape of him making this statement about unattractive women is an available video…..just go to the tape.  You will see his statement as a total lie.

 

As to the conspiracy theory, according to Trump about the accusers: “I think they want either fame or her campaign did it. And I think it’s her [Hillary’s] campaign,” Trump said this of his accusers.

 

There is no evidence on either of these possibilities. In fact, some of the accusers had to be coaxed to even come forward. Yes, some are Clinton supporters, but others clearly do not support Hillary.

 

Even as Trump has now gone against the rule of this nation since its inception, by threatening not to respect the election results, we cannot also lose sight of the mounting evidence of Trump’s mistreatment of women and his debate dismissal of their claims.

 

Let's put this into perspective.

 

Trump has called his accusers “liars”.  The well-known lawyer, Gloria Allred is currently representing some of those women that have come forward with their stories about Trump’s former assaults.  Even though the statute of limitations has passed for these assaults, the fact that he has publicly called all of them “liars”, this leaves them open to sue Trump for defamation of character.

 

Now, here’s a situation that could happen, should a miracle occur and Trump win the White House.

 

The Republicans are running the House of Representatives and they are currently expected to hold on to the House after this election.  Based on what is an impeachable offense according to the Republicans in Congress, what Donald Trump is accused of, is an impeachable offense.

 

Donald Trump is already saying that all of his accusers are liars and that they will be sued after the elections, no matter who wins.  Trump is also accusing, with no proof, that some of the rioters at his rallies were paid by the DNC and Clinton’s campaign.

 

It is becoming very apparent that there will be some very big law suits regardless who wins on November 8^th.

 

However, if the miracle does happen, and Trump should win, you will possibly see Trump having to be deposed in a case brought on by either Ms. Allred or possibly by Trump’s own law suits against all the women.  But in addition, should Trump win, Trump could also be eligible to be impeached in the same way President Bill Clinton was impeached.  This would especially be possible if the House does not remain in control of the GOP, either in this election or in 2018.

 

Even if Trump loses, I’m fairly sure that Ms. Allred and her Trump accuser will be going forward with the defamation suits against Donald Trump.

 

In any case, a lot of lawyers are going to make a lot of money.

 

So let’s examine the actual hard evidence.

 

In 2005, People magazine reporter Natasha Stoynoff, at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago was there to do a report on a first-anniversary piece on Donald and Melania Trump.  She has described how Trump pushed her against a wall and tried to kiss her, sticking his tongue down her throat.  Six of Stoynoff’s friends and co-workers have already confirmed to Ms. Allred, this part of her story. Bein so upset, Ms. Stoynoff had called a former journalism professor in tears the night of the incident.  He improperly advised her to stay quiet for fear of retaliation. Still upset, she called a close friend, Marina Grasic, the next day, to recount the incident.  She also told three People colleagues after she returned to New York. 

 

Oh, you may also be aware of the Ms. Stoynoff’s additional story that she had bumped into Melania Trump outside Trump Tower, which Melania Trump says this never happen.  However, unfortunately for Melania, there was a friend with Natasha when this occurred, and her friend also recalls that encounter.

 

Now, about the evidence for supporting Trump?

 

Well, his retired butler says he didn’t do it.  That is, he has said nothing seemed amiss when he walked in on Trump and Ms. Stoynoff years ago at Mar-a-Lago.

 

Now, please note that this is the same butler who posted on Facebook that President Obama, “should have been taken out by our military and shot as an enemy agent” and who also said it was astonishing that “a common murderer [Hillary Clinton] is even allowed to run .” 

 

In other words, for you to totally discount Ms. Stoynoff’s story, you would have to believe that she was prescient enough to describe to five friends and colleagues an encounter with Trump that mirrored his own taped Access Hollywood video account that emerged 11 years later . 

 

In addition, to believe that this story was engineered by the Clinton campaign, you would have to believe that in 2005, when there was only a vague notion of Trump running for president, Clinton and her people brilliantly recruited Stoynoff to concoct this story and plant the seeds of corroboration to spring on Trump 11 years later.  Or that the campaign enlisted six witnesses in a current conspiracy to lie on their behalf.

 

With the prospect of the amazing case discoveries, including Donald Trump being forced to submit to a deposition, it is all very inviting.

 

Imagine this man, who threatens to sue everyone in sight, having to answer questions about his on-going conduct toward women……under oath.

 

What a fitting outcome for such an ugly campaign, and for such an ugly human being.

 

Copyright G.Ater  2016