JUSTICE KAVANAUGH HAD TO AVOID ORDERING ANY DESSERT!

 

       …Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh was also the recent target of an assassin

 

It’s true, American women are now back to their 1868 subordinate status

 

Were you aware that Brett Kavanaugh, the Justice of the Supreme Court had to sneak out the back door of a Washington D.C.  Morton’s Steak House, before the dessert course.  That’s because protestors gathered out front to heckle him for voting to overturn Roe v Wade.

Of course, conservatives expressed deep outrage that Kavanaugh’s fancy steak dinner was spoiled.  This is rather ironic though, given that he and his conservative brethren just canceled the “bodily autonomy” of tens of millions of American women.  According to “my own original analysis” said Matt Ford in The New Republic, “a right to dinner is not deeply rooted in American history and tradition. That’s the standard the court just used to arrive at the conclusion that women in 2022 have no more right than women in 1868 to control their own reproductive lives.  Am I using tortured legal and historical analysis to conveniently arrive at a predetermined conclusion about the right to eat dinner?" 

Yes, that's apparently true.

Do we really want public officials to be denied “a moment’s peace in their personal lives” asked Matt Lewis in The Daily Beast.  At a time of “heightened political violence,” why are Democrats dismissing this “stalking” of Kavanaugh as a harmless exercise of freedom of speech?  Remember, said Ruth Marcus in The Washington Post, last month a California man charged with “attempting to assonate Kavanaugh” allegedly turned up at the justice’s house “in the middle of the night with a cache of weapons.”  She stated: “The pro-choicers should find ways to express justified outrage at the conservative justices without terrorizing them and their families.”

“So, Justices Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito, and the others have a right to privacy?” Said Jill Filipovic in her Substack newsletter.  How curious that is that these same justices just decided that the U.S. Constitution provides “no” privacy rights, and gave a green light to “radical governmental interference all the way up into the extremely private space of women’s uteruses.”  This telling bit of hypocrisy is a perfect illustration of what women have always known: “The right to privacy is a privilege's long reserved for men.”  The other half of the U.S. states, those women are returning to their subordinate status as the, “breeding property of men, the church and the state.“

So please forgive these second class citizens for not grieving for Brett Kavanaugh “because he couldn't order any dessert.”

Copyright G. Ater 2022