IS “TRUMPISM” BECOMING “McCARTHYISM”?
…A panicking Donald Trump?
President Trump is
broadcasting calls for scrutinizing judges.
It is
appearing obvious that President Trump is becoming frantic about what could
come from Trump's former Campaign Manager’s trial, and from his former lawyer Michael
Cohen. That is if Cohen starts to cooperate with the US attorney’s as has been reported. He's also getting more concerned about whatever will eventually
come from the special counsel, Robert Mueller’s Russian investigation.
Trump may be
calling it a “Witch Hunt” and a “hoax”, but for this investigation,
there are already 5 of the campaign’s members charged, 4 guilty pleas and 27 indictments. In the Paul Manafort case
alone, he has 32 counts against him for bank fraud, money laundering, and
financial skulduggery. Doesn’t sound
like much of a “Witch Hunt” to me.
But what is
seriously startling to me is what is happening to what is being called “Trumpism”.
Trumpism today
is starting more and more to look like “McCarthyism”
The Justice
Department has for the first time ever, released a redacted
warrant application that the investigators submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
(FISA Court) asking for permission to surveil former Trump adviser, Carter
Page. President Trump and his enablers
had made this document central to their claims of FBI bias in its conduct of
the Russia probe. But in fact, the
documents showed that the investigative process was totally sound and the
Republican narrative is totally paranoid and cynical.
Also
participating in this degradation against the FBI on Sunday was the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob
Goodlatte (R-VA), who insisted that “there is a serious problem with the FBI” presenting a warrant
application that, he claimed, was based on the so-called Steele dossier. But the released application document showed that it wasn’t. The dossier is a collection
of some verified and some unverified reports about the behavior of Mr. Trump and his associates. As Goodlatte echoed his line against the FBI, Sen.
Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) said that: “the
warrant, the FISA warrant process needs to be looked at closely by Congress.”
I was
surprised that Graham put himself in this group as he is usually a more balance
and sensible GOP member in these
areas. And Graham had served in the US Air
Force JAG Corps. He should know better than to assist in the trashing of a
legitimate federal law enforcement operation.
Fortunately,
not all the Republicans are acting like Goodlatte and Graham. The facts support a different
Republican’s take: “You have an individual here who has openly bragged
about his ties to Russia,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said of Mr. Page. “And the FBI’s job is to protect this country
from threats. . . . So they look at all this information. They say: We have a
guy here who’s always in Russia, brags about Russia, and we have reason to
believe, and they list those reasons, why this is someone we should be
watching. And they [FBI] followed the legal process by which to do so.”
The document
did show that the federal investigators did rely in part on the Steele dossier,
but they also clearly informed the judges that the dossier came from a
politically motivated source. As it
happens, the dossier’s information on Mr. Page turned out to be more credible
than some of its other claims. The
document also contained other credible information on Mr. Page’s connections to Russia.
Moreover, as The Post’s Philip
Bump has noted, the redacted sections that obviously contain sensitive
information on Mr. Page’s activities, those grew larger with every application
renewal.
The document
was compelling enough to persuade all the judges to authorize the surveillance
and to renew it three times. This is not surprising as Judges routinely grant
warrants on the basis of preliminary evidence. If they did not, law enforcement
officials would have an impossible time gathering proof of wrongdoing in cases
large and small.
One would
think that real conservative Republicans would normally not want to hamstring
law enforcement.
But, just as
it was with classic McCarthyism, with Trumpism, the number of targets to go
after is now expanding, even as any evidence of official wrongdoing is
non-existent. That was also the case with McCarthyism.
Now the
president is panicking as he is broadcasting calls to scrutinize all
of the judges involved in the multiple authorizing’s of the surveillance. How many Republicans will continue to support
this vicious attack on the Justice Department and the judiciary?
This is not
just an attack on a single government agency, it is an attack on American
democracy.
And we have a
president that is starting to come unglued. A president that is kissing up to our enemies and talking down our friends.
If this doesn't stop, this is how democracies begin to decline.
Copyright G.Ater 2018
Comments
Post a Comment