THE PRESIDENT’S LATEST LIE COULD BECOME DEADLY
…President Trump after threatening N.
Korea’s Kim Jong Un
Trump declares a red-line against
North Korea
President
Trump has lied to us again, and this time it’s about as critical of a lie as
has any statement by a US president.
The president
said that he doesn’t “draw red-lines”,
as President Obama did about Syria, and that he says he doesn’t telegraph what he’s
going to do, when he’s going to do it and where he’s going to do it.
Well then,
what in the hell did he think he was he doing when he said to the North Korean
Dictator, Kim Jong Un: “North Korea best
not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and
fury and frankly power, the likes of which this world has never seen before.”
Sure sounds
like drawing a red-line to me!
Even the
former Vietnam “prisoner-of-war”, and
the current Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator John
McCain (R-AZ) said about the above Trump comment: "The great leaders I've seen don't threaten unless they're ready to act,
and I'm not sure President Trump is ready to act," McCain told this to
an Arizona radio station. "I take
exception to the president's comments because you got to be sure you can do
what you say you're going to do."
The senator
said the US should instead be focused on working with China and building up its
missile defenses in the wake of a report that an updated intelligence assessment
found North Korea now has the capability to miniaturize a nuclear warhead for
delivery at the US by a N. Korean ICBM.
The
president’s unsettling threat, aimed directly at North Korea, was reckless and
unnecessary. It resembled exactly how
Kim Jong Un regularly denounces the United States. Its bombastic, frantic and hyperbolic. Why
would the president of the world’s most powerful nation want to descend to third-rate
North Korean dictator’s level?
To raise the
specter of nuclear war, and to do so to
ward off mere bogus threats, that alone is drawing that red line in a foolish and
destabilizing manner.
Since nuclear
bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki seven decades ago, they were never
again been used in combat. There is a
reason for that.
However, the
danger that they will be used again has never disappeared. Unfortunately, the years since the end of
World War II have been filled with many false alarms and close calls, which
under Trump, could easily begin recurring.
The United
States and Russia have kept thousands of nuclear missiles on launch-ready
alert, meaning they are ready to launch within minutes of a presidential order.
American adversaries know this. Mr. Trump’s threat of “fire and fury” may sound like hype to American ears. But those words could be heard quite
differently by others, such as Mr. Kim.
Being a belligerent leader of a nuclear North Korea, Mr. Trump’s
language could easily be misunderstood.
No, he didn’t
say precisely what exactly would lead to that “fire and fury”. But he did
say that North Korea should stop threatening the United States. And how did Kim Jong Un respond to the
president’s statement? He immediately went against Trump's statement and threatened
that they were considering an attack on the American island of Guam. Yes, it was a threat against a threat. At some point, when will the threats become a
reality?
The upshot of
these threats could be a major miscalculation by either party, or heaven
forbid, an accidental entry into a conflict that has haunted the globe since
the dawn of the atomic age.
The US nuclear
arsenal is kept in harness for one purpose only: that is as a deterrence.
The definition
of deterrence is to “offer a credible
threat of retaliation” that would prevent an adversary from attacking.
Credibility, the essence of deterrence, means the other side has to believe the
threat is real. But with all the lies
and falsehoods that have come from this Trump administration, how does anyone
know if a threat is real or false? At any time, Kim Jong Un could say "It's for real", and then immediately order an attack on their neighbor and US ally, South Korea, not the US.
Deterrence
flows from maintaining a modern and capable nuclear force, not from boasts or
thoughtless threats. “We should not be
engaging in the same kind of blustery and provocative statements as North Korea
about nuclear war,” said Ben Cardin (D-MD), from the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee. “No one should think
that a conflict with North Korea will be a quick little glorious war, or be
tempted by false hopes that North Korea’s nuclear program can be destroyed with
a single antiseptic surgical strike.”
During Trump’s
stay at his Bedminster, N.J., golf club, this was where the president made his
seemingly “off-the-cuff” statement
against North Korea.
North Korea’s
steadily advancing nuclear weapons and missile programs are highly serious. The Post reported that intelligence
officials believe the N. Korea capital city, Pyongyang regime, has successfully
miniaturized their nuclear warheads to fit on a missile. That is the latest step in a weapons system
that could possibly hit the United States, Japan, or even Russia.
Dealing with
that threat from N. Korea will require patient pressure and skilled diplomacy,
perhaps continuing for many years.
Instead,
Mr. Trump just had to strut his stuff into the arena with a jarring
bombastic and rhetorical hand-grenade.
If this is how
our president is going to react to such serious threats, we are in seriously
deep do-do.
Copyright
G.Ater 2017
Comments
Post a Comment