WILL THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS DEAL WITH TRUMP AS THEY DID WITH HILLARY?
…Former General Mike Flynn became
famous for the “Lock Her Up! chants against Hillary
How will the Republican Congress
weigh in on Trump’s revealing info to the Russians?
Do you all
remember what the reason for all those chants of “Lock her up!” from the conservative critics of Hillary
Clinton?
Well, if you
recall, it was all about Hillary’s use of a private server while she was our Secretary
of State. The sticking point of that was
according to the FBI, the possibility of classified information being put at a risk
of being intercepted by foreign agents, should her server have been
compromised. But Clinton’s team had insisted
that the server hadn’t been breached and the FBI said there was no
evidence that it was.
What is bizarre
is that Donald Trump is president today in part because of voters’ concerns
about protecting US classified material.
And you will
recall that the now fired National
Security Advisor, Mike Flynn had at one time said: “I have called on Hillary Clinton to drop out of the race, because she, she put our nation’s security
at extremely high risk with her careless use of a private email server.” He
then joined in the chants: “Lock her up!
Lock her up!”
Isn’t it
ironic that now yesterday, the Washington Post reported that, as
president, Trump himself revealed classified information in a conversation with
Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov and Ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyak. At this meeting in the Oval Office, with
these Russian diplomats, where by the way, only Russian press and photographers
were allowed, Trump described details about an ISIS terror threat related to
the use of laptop computers on aircraft.
So, with that
in mind, I think it’s worth rev-isiting what Trump himself said about Clinton’s
e-mail security. It was a subject that
came up regularly in Trump’s freewheeling stump speeches.
In Redding,
Calif., last June, Trump said: “She
could have used the government stuff, assume everybody’s listening to you — I
always do. Every time I pick up a phone, I assume people are listening, you
know. Now, you sue their a — off if they are. If you can find them, you drop a
little lawsuit on them and make them pay, bigly. For her to do what she did
puts our country at risk. She’s secretary of state.”
In New York, in
June he also said: “We can’t hand
over our government to someone whose deepest, darkest secrets may be in the
hands of our enemies.”
In Doral, Fla.,
the next month he said: “So how can
Hillary Clinton be briefed on this unbelievably delicate information when it
was just proven that she lied and that her server shouldn’t have had it and
that they’re missing 33,000 emails and that’s just the beginning. … I don’t
think that it’s safe to have Hillary Clinton, in light of what just happened,
and in light of what we just found out, I don’t think it’s safe to have Hillary
Clinton be briefed on national security because the word will get out.”
In August, in Portland,
Maine, Trump said: “Her email scandal put
our entire country at risk. Made our sensitive secrets vulnerable to hacking by
foreign adversaries.”
Then in Greenville,
N.C. in September: “This is really, if we
bring it up, this is like Watergate, only it’s worse, because here our foreign
enemies were in a position to hack our most sensitive national security
secrets. We can’t have someone in the Oval Office who doesn’t understand the
meaning of the word ‘confidential.’ ”
This kind of
blather continued right up to the election.
But Trump
wasn’t alone. The conservative media jumped
on board, and others on the right were quick to question Clinton’s fitness for
office.
On two
occasions, Republicans on Capitol Hill explicitly described Clinton’s email
server as treasonous.
This was done
by Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX.), who made that claim on Fox News. And Rep. Mo Brooks
(R-AL) who coincidentally announced plans to run for US Senate in his home
state, he had even suggested impeaching Clinton should she be elected president,
thanks to her lax use of classified information, since “Hillary Clinton has, in my opinion, committed a high crime or
misdemeanor or treason, which is the constitutional standard. She
betrayed her country by exposing national security information to risk by our
adversaries,” Brooks said. “That is a
criminal offense. That makes it an impeachable offense. She probably has
committed an impeachable offense, therefore she probably should be impeached.
But in all likelihood she won’t be because Congress doesn’t have the political
will to do so.”
With all of
this, I wonder if Mr. Brooks will say the same things about his Republican
President Trump? And will the Republican
Congress weigh in on this issue?
I doubt it.
Copyright G.Ater 2017
Comments
Post a Comment