CONSERVATIVES WHINE ABOUT IRAN AGREEMENT, BUT OFFER NO ALTERNATIVES BUT WAR
…The Fox contributor and false
intellectual, Mr. George Will
As usual, if the idea was Obama’s,
the Republicans hate it, regardless of if they have no alternatives.
Once again,
the conservative columnist, George Will,
shows that it really is time for him to move on to another career. Perhaps stamp collecting or a collector of
bobble-head dolls. Will has really
out-done himself over the past weeks.
He’s told some big whoppers both about Planned Parenthood and has gone after the Iran deal in spades.
As with most
conservatives, Will is speaking out against the P5+1’s nuclear deal with
Iran. But even though it’s been made
clear that by not accepting the current deal, the chances of getting the
leaders of Iran and the other P5+1 countries back to the table again are zero
to none. But as usual, Mr. Will still
has no suggestions for what to do if everybody walks away.
All that Will
and the others want to do is whine about the deal, but they do so without
offering any alternatives. Will does
this knowing that all the experts say that if the deal were to go away, Iran
could have an operational nuclear device within 12 to 18 months.
We all know
that if we go as far back as President JFK, he had said after becoming
president that with a basic nuclear technology that goes back to the 1940’s,
there eventually could be 15-20 nations with nuclear capability. Therefore, just getting Iran to put their
program on hold is a very big deal, especially considering that it’s not
exactly a development of tomorrow’s latest rocket science.
In fact, Mr.
Will made that point himself when he stated that this July 16th was
the 70th anniversary of the first US nuclear explosion that was
detonated in Alamogordo, New Mexico. The
reality is that the technology is so fundamental, that the basics of what it
takes to develop and manufacture a nuclear device was actually printed in a
monthly edition of a Popular Science Magazine back in the
1950’s. Today, it is all readily
available by anyone just using Google on the internet.
In fact, according to the latest statistics, the following nine
countries: United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea, all have nuclear weapons.
Also a fact is the total number of nuclear devices available today is
estimated at 16,300 nuclear devices.
That’s enough nuclear bombs to kill most of the population of the world
and to turn the world into a giant radioactive globe for thousands of years.
Therefore,
just getting the extremist Iranian Muslim leadership to agree to sit down and
negotiate their nuclear efforts, that was a very big deal.
Mr. Will
thinks that because there were initial statements where the American
negotiators had stated that the agreement would include “anywhere,
anytime” inspections, since the final agreement isn’t “anywhere anytime”, and the inspections will require some notice, it
must be a bad deal. Will and his other
conservatives, that basically all hate the president, they feel that regardless
of whether the agreement is an acceptable alternative, their only alternative
is to walk away.
In other
words, instead of putting the Iranian nuclear development on hold for 10 to 20
years, let’s walk away and let them go ahead and have the H-Bomb in 12 to 18
months. We then won’t have any knowledge
of what’s going on in Iran and we’ll also let them continue developing their
ICBM missile development for delivering that bomb. Oh, that’s really smart.
And by the
way, if you do walk away, how would you then get the P-5+1 nations back to the
table, not to mention the Iranian ayatollahs?
It is correct
that no one thinks that the agreement is the best of the best. But as it used to be in the US Congress,
before the word “compromise” wasn’t
treated like a dirty word, agreements between the two ideologies of
conservative and progressives, the results usually gave both parties some of
what both parties wanted. That’s what
diplomatic negotiations versus military conflict is supposed to be about!
With no
apparent stated alternatives, I find it interesting that the conservatives are
talking so strongly against the latest approach. And who knows what the next generation in 10
to 15 years, that will be running the show in Iran, what will they want? Perhaps they will want to stop being isolated
and will want to join the world community.
At least, being able to monitor what’s going on in the country may be
able to give the rest of the world a heads-up on what’s going on in Iran. Today, no outsiders have any access to Iran’s
internal issues.
Stranger
things have happened than a nation coming to its senses.
Copyright G.Ater 2015
Comments
Post a Comment