BEWARE: IT’S ALREADY PILING “HIGH & DEEP” FROM THE FAR RIGHT “WING-NUTS”
…Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC),
one of the key GOP Wing-Nut Hawks
A bogus “Bill of Goods” from the
GOP for 2016 is already being widely distributed.
Yep, it’s
already started.
If you are
against adding American “boots-on-the-ground”
in Iraq & Syria; going to war with Iran, and being the world’s police force
in Nigeria; then you’d better get ready for the hawkish rhetoric coming from
the potential GOP presidential
candidates in wanting more of Americas military to be spread all over the
middle east and western Africa.
We’re already
hearing how the conservatives are saying the US should take responsibility for
the 200,000 killed in Syria, (including
10,000 children), the rise of ISIL in Syria & Iraq, that nuclear
proliferation in Iran isn’t being resolved fast enough, and of course, that
even though 60% of all Americans approve, the move on the latest decision
regarding Cuba was totally misplaced.
According to
the far right, the issues in Syria will eventually become “Obama’s Rwanda”, referencing to all the massacres that happened in
that country in 1994.
So, according
to the right, “It’s all Obama’s fault,
and he has been the worst president in 50 years.”
Really?
Apparently we
are supposed to ignore that President Obama has been trying to have America
lead a version of “global progress and
basic social order”, and to do it at the least cost to the American
taxpayer. All this, while allowing the
nation to focus on fixing our internal issues.
The same negatives issues and national crisis that was initially created
under the previous eight years of the Bush / Cheney stewardship.
Even though
the opposition has totally ignored the real results, it’s hard not to admit
that under the Obama’s administration, they have delivered new jobs in
spite of the Republican’s attempted interventions. In addition, the stock market has gone
ballistic, gasoline prices are at record low levels, the nation is today the largest
supplier of oil and natural gas as well as that of wind and solar power. We are no longer totally supporting two wars
in the middle east, the unemployment rate has continued to improve and the Affordable Care Act is working better
than anyone had imagined.
Even a
conservative writer in the Washington
Post had to admit, “[The] Republicans
opposed every useful policy advance and now [they] want to kill the ones they
didn’t manage to strangle at birth.”
I couldn’t
have said that any better.
The president
has now claimed that “middle-class
economics works”. As much as the
opposition would love to claim that Obama’s economy is the ideological
extension of Elizabeth Warren’s liberal ideas, the reality is, like it or not,
Obama can also take credit for Wall
Street’s astounding success.
Something that Senator Warren would never take credit for, and she
wouldn’t want to anyway.
Contrary to
popular belief, even though they won’t outwardly admit it, as is Obama, many
Republicans are open to raising additional revenue from the wealthy. But for them, it must only come from closing
tax loopholes. In reality, as with
Obama, GOP leaders would probably
accept the limiting of the mortgage deduction for a second home, but they won’t
support additional taxes on any savings and investments.
Obama’s ideas,
as stated in his State of the Union
speech, such as increasing the child-care tax credit, providing additional help
to make community college affordable and paid maternity leave. These are classic Democratic ideas, not
blazing or boldly progressive ideas. They are middle-sized proposals that
address middle-class needs. They can be faulted for poor design or the manner
in which they are funded, but they have none of the ideological ambition of the
Affordable Care Act, or even Obama’s
plan for universal preschool education.
If there is a
major hole in the Obama approach to America’s economy, it is that the condition
of middle-class families during the Obama years, when measured by net worth,
real wages, business and home ownership, these have all gotten worse.
The key
Republicans that are potential 2016 presidential candidates including Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Chris Christie and Rand Paul, they are all very aware of this
negative issue and are finally talking about it. But this does appear highly disingenuous, as
it’s totally the opposite of their attitude against the so called “dependent 47% of Americans” that they
were campaigning against in the 2012 election.
But, today
they are accurately pointing out that the condition of middle-class families
during the Obama years has not been helped in these areas for many of the
American middle class.
Republicans
now do have a real case to make for their own version of middle-class
economics.
But will the
average American worker see that most of what the conservatives are saying is
just a bunch of bogus “talking points”
when you seriously look at what they want to offer middle class Americans?
In fact, just what are they offering up for the middle class?
I guess for
2016, we can only hope that America’s voters will see the real truth.
Copyright G.Ater 2015
Comments
Post a Comment