TRUMP’S ILLEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST THE US POSTAL SERVICE
…Trump
is against the US Postal Service
Trump
opposes $25 billion emergency funds sought by the US Postal Service
President
Trump on Thursday said he opposes both election aid for states and an emergency
bailout for the US Postal Service because he wants to keep many Americans from
voting by mail. He thinks nothing of putting at risk the nation’s ability to administer medications to seniors or ballots for the Nov. 3 elections.
Trump
has been attacking mail balloting and the integrity of voting by mail for
months. But his latest broadside makes
explicit his intent to stand in the way of the needed money to help state and
local officials to administer elections during the
coronavirus pandemic. With nearly
180 million Americans eligible to vote by mail, the president’s actions could
usher in widespread delays, long lines and disenfranchising of the voters this
fall.
Trump
said his sole purpose is to prevent Democrats from expanding mail-balloting,
which he has repeatedly claimed, as usual, without evidence, would invite
widespread fraud. The president has previously admitted that he believes voting
by mail would allow more Democrats to cast ballots and hurt Republican
candidates, including himself. How he
feels this is a legal way of acting is beyond me.
In his
interview with Fox Business Network’s, Maria Bartiromo, Trump said he
opposes the $25 billion emergency injection sought by the US Postal
Service. This includes the Democratic
proposal to provide $3.6 billion in additional election funding for the states.
Both of those requests have been tied up in congressional negotiations over a
new coronavirus relief package that could save many American lives.
“They
need that money in order to make the post office work, so it can take all of
these millions and millions of ballots,” said the president, claiming again that mail
ballots would be “fraudulent,” one of more than 80 false attacks he has made
against the election’s integrity just since March. This has been confirmed according to The
Washington Post who’s Fact Checkers have now said that Trump has passed the
20,000 mark for the number of miss leading or false statements he’s made since
he became president.
“If we
don’t make a deal, that means they don’t get the money,” Trump added. “That means they can’t have
universal mail-in voting. They just can’t have it.”
Trump knows that many of his supporters think that "universal mail-in voting," means that all Americans would be "required to use mail-in voting," which is also false.
So, Trump
is trying, out in the open, to go against one of the key areas of the original
US Constitution which specifically lists the US Post Office as a needed
organization for a democratic nation.
Trump
has since told reporters at the White House that he would not veto
legislation that has funding for the US Postal Service, but he added that “the
reason the post office needs that much money is they have all of these millions
of ballots coming in from nowhere and nobody knows from where and where they’re
going.”
Just
another pile of crap from the president.
If
Democrats agree to a deal, the president continued, “the money they need for
the mail-in ballots would be taken care. If we agree to it. That doesn’t mean
we’re going to agree to it.” Now that's pure
Trumpism.
Trump’s
remarks prompted a swift outcry from Democrats and even some real Republicans, (of
which there seem to be only a few remaining).
All of this, while voting-rights advocates denounced what
they described as “An unprecedented threat by a sitting president to
undermine the election for his own political benefit.”
“The
president is afraid of the American people,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). “He’s
been afraid for a while. He knows that, on the legit, it’d be hard for him to
win.”
“Pure
Trump,”
offered Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee, in response to the
president’s remarks. “He doesn’t want an election.” (Because Trump always follows the polls.)
As Trump
has lagged in all the polls, well behind Biden, the president and his allies
have increased their false questioning of the integrity of the vote. And they have intensified their actions in
the courts, revealing their far-reaching strategy of restricting the mail-in
voting and the challenging of the results if he loses.
The Republican
National Committee (RNC) and conservative groups are actually going after their unprecedented effort to limit expansion of mail balloting before
the November election. They are spending
tens of millions of dollars on lawsuits and advertising aimed at restricting those who receives ballots and those who remains on the voter rolls.
The Republican party is also working to train as many as 35,000 poll-watchers to monitor both
in-person voting and ballot counting, mostly in the key battleground states.
And the RNC
and Trump campaign advisers are now mapping out their post-election
strategy. This strategy includes “how
to challenge mail ballots without postmarks, as they anticipate weeks-long
legal fights in an array of states”.
This is according to some people willing to talk that are familiar with
the plans, but who obviously spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe
internal discussions.
The
campaign is using their money for their plans to have many lawyers ready to
mobilize in every state and they expect that legal battles could play out after
Election Day in such states as Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Michigan and
Nevada, the same under anonymity people said.
Trump’s
claims about voting-by-mail have of course, also been echoed by Trump's Attorney
General, William Barr, who has repeatedly said, also without evidence, that
mail-in voting could lead to a “high risk” of fraud and interference by
foreign countries.
It must
be noted here, that previous voting-by-mail fraud has only been found in 0.0008%
of past elections. And the number of
fraudulent ballots has never affected the outcome of any US election.
At the
same time, changes put in place at the US Postal Service, of course, by a top GOP
donor, have sparked mail delays across country. This has sparked fears that ballots will not
be delivered in time to count in November.
Many of
the president’s critics have said that he crossed a line with Thursday’s
remarks by admitting his willingness to hold back funds necessary to make the
election both secure and accessible to all Americans. “If they
don’t get those two items, that means you can’t have universal mail-in voting
because they’re not equipped to have it,” he said.
Wendy
Weiser, director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for
Justice at New York University, described Trump’s statements as a “line
in the sand” that Congress must not let him cross. “It is
outrageous,” Weiser
said. “It is an attack on the very foundations of our democratic system. And
he’s daring people to let him get away with it or to stand up to him. The
gauntlet’s been thrown down, and people now need to stand up for our system.”
It was
good to see that Trump’s opposition to the $3.6 billion in election funding could
has put him at odds with some Republicans, including Sen. Roy Blunt
(R-Mo.). Blunt, has indicated that his
support for some additional federal money to help the states carry out the vote
during the pandemic. “We
need to have enough money to do our best to be sure that the November elections
are held safely and results are available,” Blunt told reporters.
Democrats
have proposed more election money for the states, saying the resources are
necessary to pay for a wide range of preparations to assist both in-person and
mail voting in the health crisis. “We have
to make it easier and doable,” said
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), a top advocate for the additional election funds.
State
and local officials say they need money for protective equipment to prevent Corona infections among poll workers, and sanitizing supplies for polling locations. This is along with paper stock, printing costs and high-capacity ballot scanners for an
expected surge in mail-in voting.
Roxanna
Moritz, the auditor and commissioner of elections in Scott County, Iowa, said
she may have to choose between offering early-voting satellite locations and
paying for a second or even third round of mailing voters absentee ballot
request forms.
“Depending
on my budget I usually do early voting satellites at five libraries for three
full weeks,” Moritz said. She said she received $19,000 in funding from the
first relief bill, but “$19,000 goes real quick” when you’re purchasing
plastic shields and protective equipment for the more than 60 polling locations
her office opened in the primary.
Moritz
said she doesn’t understand the president’s position on mail balloting, given
how many Republicans are also likely to vote absentee. “At some
point in time, the Trump administration or the Republican Party is going to
have to realize that if there are 60 to 75% of people voting by mail, those are
their voters, too,” she
said.
Tom
Ridge, a Republican and former homeland security secretary under George W.
Bush, said in an interview that with “absolutely no historical anecdotes”
for the type of massive fraud that Trump claims could occur, it’s impossible
not to conclude that the president’s real concern is his expectation for
losing.
“To
subvert the process and discredit the use of absentee ballots is a shameful
exercise,” Ridge said.
GOP Rep. Tom Cole, who hails from rural Oklahoma
and once oversaw the state’s elections systems as secretary of state, said
Thursday that he was not concerned about fraud in the election. “That
just doesn’t happen to the degree that a lot of people seem to think it does,”
he said, adding that election administrators are “a very able and honorable
group of public servants and usually have operations that are above reproach.”
Trump’s
opposition to funds for the Postal Service comes as the agency is in a
precarious spot. It has struggled with its finances for years as volumes of
first-class and marketing mail, the agency’s most profitable items, have
steadily declined.
The
onset of the pandemic turned that challenge into a full-blown crisis. The
economic shutdown caused a steep drop in mail volumes, and postal leaders
originally predicted the agency could run out of money by October.
Congress
agreed in an early round of pandemic relief spending to grant the Postal
Service $13 billion in emergency funding, but Trump and Treasury Secretary
Steven Mnuchin said they would reject any proposals that included direct aid,
instead agreeing to a $10 billion loan.
The House
approved $25 billion in postal aid in April, and a bipartisan bill in the
Senate introduced by Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) would do the same, along with
stripping conditions from Treasury’s loan.
On the
Senate’s final day of the summer session, the few Republicans on hand did not
want to comment on Trump’s latest assault on the Postal Service.
“I have
no comment on that,” Sen.
Pat Roberts (R-Kansas) said as he left the near-empty chamber.
As he
entered the floor, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) ignored a
question about funding for the Postal Service.
At least
one Republican senator on Thursday spoke out against the president’s opposition
to funding for the agency. Sen. Susan Collins told the Portland Press Herald
that even before his remarks, she sent a letter to Postmaster General Louis
DeJoy demanding an explanation for the service cuts she’s been hearing about in
her state.
“And so
I do disagree with the president, very strongly, on that issue,” said Collins, who is facing a tough reelection
bid. “The Postal Service is absolutely essential, particularly to a large,
rural state like ours.”
In a
letter to postal workers Thursday obtained by The Post, Postmaster DeJoy
said he remains committed to returning the Postal Service to solvency but also
said he intends to protect service for the fall election.
He
confirmed recent reports of delivery delays but called them “unintended
consequences” of shifts that ultimately will improve service. We are
working feverishly to stabilize this,” he said, adding: “This will increase
our performance for the election and upcoming peak season and maintain the high
level of public trust we have earned for dedication and commitment to our
customers throughout our history.”
Trump
told reporters Thursday that he would not tell DeJoy to reverse changes that
have slowed the mail, saying, “I want the post office to run properly.” Yeah, Right.
Trump’s
rhetoric on mail voting has frustrated his advisers, who say the president is
often incorrect and could discourage their own voters.
“In
mail-in voting, there isn’t an inherent political advantage to either party.
There never has been and there never will be,” Tom Ridge, former Republican
governor of Pennsylvania said. “The advantage goes to the party that is most
effective in identifying those voters.”
It only
we had a president that would agree with that idea.
Copyright
G. Ater 2020
Comments
Post a Comment