AMERICAN DEMOCRACY IS IN TROUBLE DUE TO PRESIDENTIAL MISMANAGEMENT
…This man is why we are in trouble
“The Post”is doing what they do best… telling
the truth about Donald Trump
I’m sure that many of my readers know that I am
a true believer in The Washington Post, and many of its reporters. Yes, the newspaper is owned by the Amazon founder,
Jeff Bezos, but fortunately, he has left the running of the paper to its
Editor’s and its Editorial Board.
The Post just announced the
following: “Four years ago, after Mr. Trump was nominated in Cleveland, The
Post Editorial Board did something it had never done before: Even before the
Democrats had nominated their candidate, we wrote that we could never, under
any circumstances, endorse Donald Trump for president. He was, we said,
“uniquely unqualified” to be president.
Four years later, we are doing something else
for the first time: We will publish a series of editorials on the damage this
president has caused...and the danger he would pose in a second term.
In the first series, we explain why we believe
a second term could harm America’s experiment in democracy beyond repair.”
I will give you a preview below of The
Post’s first article in the series.
I will then leave it to you if you want to follow the series. You can access The Post via the
internet, usually for free, or for a small subscription fee. But either way, you can obtain their articles
which are usually well written and are a good example of the real news as is
required by this nation’s free press as stated in the US Constitution. Yes, from The Post, it is usually, “The
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.”
After
being nominated at the pared-down Republican convention, President Trump will
make this argument to the American people: “Things were great until China
loosed the novel coronavirus on the world. If you reelect me, I will
make things great again.” Or some
such claim.
Our
Democracy is truly in Peril
Part one
of The Post’s series of editorials will be on the damage President Trump
has caused, and the danger he will pose in a second term.
His
seeking reelection in the midst of the worst public health crisis and sharpest
economic downturn of our lifetimes, this may, realistically, be the only
argument left to him. But for a president who has spoken more than 20,000
lies during his presidency, his argument rests on two huge falsehoods.
One is
that the nation, his presidency and, above all, Mr. Trump himself, he claims
are innocent victims of Covid-19. But
the fact is, his own negligence, ignorance and malpractice turned what would
have been a difficult challenge for any president, he has turned it into a
national disaster.
The
other issue is that there was really nothing to admire in his record before the
virus struck. It is true that the
economic growth initiated under President Barack Obama had continued, at about
the same modest rate. But Mr. Trump achieved his growth by ratcheting up
America’s deficit spending and his long-term debt to record levels. Then he
added a gigantic tax cut that showered benefits on the nation’s wealthy.
Just be
aware, that beyond the low unemployment rate he gained and then lost, history
will record Mr. Trump’s presidency as a march of wanton, uninterrupted, tragic
destruction. America’s standing in the
world, our loyalty to our allies, our commitment to democratic values, the
normal constitutional checks and the balances, our faith in reason and science,
our concern for the Earth’s health, the respect for public service, our belief
in civility and honest debate, the US beacon to refugees in need, and our
aspirations to equality and diversity and basic decency. Those are regular issues for most US
Presidents to continue…..but Mr. Trump has torched them all.
Four
years ago, after Mr. Trump was nominated in Cleveland, we [The Post] did
something they had never done before.
Even before the Democrats had nominated their candidate, The Post
told you that they could never, under any circumstances, endorse Donald Trump
for president. He was, they said again, “uniquely unqualified” to be
president.
“Mr.
Trump’s politics of denigration and division could strain the bonds that have
held a diverse nation together,” they
warned. “His contempt for constitutional norms might reveal the nation’s
two-century-old experiment in checks and balances to be more fragile than we
knew.”
The
nation has indeed spent much of the past three-plus years wondering whether the
national experiment could even survive Mr. Trump. The resistance from some institutions, has been
heartening. The depth of the president’s incompetence, which even The Post
could not have imagined, may have actually saved the democracy from a even more
rapid descent.
But the
devastation has been alarming. The attitude of the Republican Party has been
nauseating. Misbehavior of that many
people that had been vowed to never to accept Mr. Trump as normal, that has
become routine.
A second
term might injure the democratic experiment beyond recovery.
And so,
over the coming weeks, [The Post] will do something else they have never
done before. They will publish a series
of editorials on the damage this president has caused, as well as the danger he
would pose in a second term. And The Post will unabashedly urge you to
do your civic duty and vote: “Vote early and vote safely, but vote.”
“I alone
can fix it,” Mr
Trump proclaimed at his convention four years ago.
So, how
has that turned out?
His
campaign, as our columnist Michael Gerson has noted, was based on the
premises that Mr. Obama and all his predecessors had made such a botch of
things that nothing could get worse.
According to Trump, “That expertise and moral leadership were not
only irrelevant, they were handicaps.”
Mr.
Trump has decisively disproven these premises.
By most
objective measures, (the stock market indices being the exception), things
today are worse.
But, you
say, is it fair to blame him for the coronavirus?
No. Mr.
Trump did not cause the pandemic; and China, as he says, mishandled it at the
start.
But
every other nation in the world has had to deal with the same virus, and most
of them have done so far more competently, and with more evidence of learning
and improvement as they go, than the United States.
More
people have died of Covid-19 in the United States than in any other country.
Even adjusted for population, the death rate here is almost five times
worse than Germany, and almost 100 times worse than in South Korea.
These
are the facts. This is the reality. And the excess deaths and illness are
directly attributable to Mr. Trump’s failures of leadership.
Trump
has failed to prepare the nation for a pandemic, though experts for years had
warned of the possibility.
When the
virus emerged, he first praised China’s handling of it, then imposed China
travel restrictions, which was too late to offer any protection.
For
months, when he could have been preparing the nation, he insisted the virus
would “just go away.”
When
reality washed that nonsense away, he allowed government experts to guide the
nation, but only for a few weeks. As the
nation began to make some headway, Mr. Trump, more concerned with the impact on
his reelection prospects than with the risk to human life, he urged Americans
to ignore expert advice and to “liberate” their states. Oh, and never mind wearing a mask or social
distancing.
The
result is the worst of all worlds: unneeded deaths, no possibility of real
re-opening and increasing the “carnage” that Mr. Trump railed against
four years ago: unemployment, inequality, opioid addiction.
Perhaps
most frightening: Even now, there is: no plan, no learning, no strategy for
testing and reopening. Under his leadership, it is all too easy to imagine
that our children will still be out of school a year from now, or two, or
three.
A
president’s first duty is to keep the nation safe. But if he has failed at home, maybe Mr. Trump
has a better record overseas?
He
continued a successful campaign to demolish the Islamic State, the self-styled
caliphate that established itself on both sides of the Iraq-Syria border after
Mr. Obama’s premature disengagement. The recently announced peace deal between
Israel and the tiny United Arab Emirates (UAE) is a step forward. Mr.
Trump has kept the nation out of major conflict.
But
neither the country nor the world are safer four years after. The nuclear
programs in Iran and North Korea, which Mr. Trump said he could easily take
care of, are less constrained than ever. Russia continues to illegally occupy
parts of three sovereign nations, including Ukraine. The malign dictatorship in
Venezuela, which Mr. Trump vowed to dislodge, remains firmly entrenched.
To the
greatest challenge of our time, Mr. Trump has failed most destructively. That
challenge is the rise of authoritarian powers, most notably China. Like
dictatorships before them, they threaten the values upon which this nation was
founded: individual dignity and liberty, the freedom to worship and speak and
think. But unlike past dictatorships, they are bolstered by technologies that
enable unprecedented surveillance and intrusion into what was once the private
sphere.
As FDR
said 80 years ago, when democracy was similarly under threat, “There can be
no ultimate peace between their philosophy of government and our philosophy of
government.” If they should gain the upper hand around the world, “We
should enter upon a new and terrible era in which the whole world, our
hemisphere included, would be run by threats of brute force.”
Mr.
Trump, in his fourth year, has branded China an enemy, mostly because he needs
a pandemic scapegoat, but also because he hopes it will give him a campaign
issue.
But for
three years, he embraced and admired Chinese dictator Xi Jinping and made clear
his indifference to China’s genocide of its Muslim Uighur population, its
stifling of Hong Kong, the repression of its own people. Mr. Trump’s one
concern was China’s available commerce, and even there he failed: China’s
economy is no more open to US business than it was four years ago.
A
president truly attuned to the Chinese threat would be investing in American
universities and science; welcoming the smartest young people from around the
world to study and work in the United States; and building alliances with
like-minded democracies such as South Korea, Japan, Canada and Germany. In each
case, the president has done the opposite.
Most of
all, he would be modeling the virtues of democracy, but again he has done the
reverse, admiring and embracing the methods of strongmen such as Mr. Xi. Mr. Trump denigrates a free press, makes a
mockery of free markets, elevates insult over civil exchange, shows contempt
for the rule of law in civilian and military courts, devalues truth, and
dismisses legitimate oversight from Congress, the courts and executive branch
inspectors general.
Last
fall, Mr. Trump became the third president in history to be impeached. The
House of Representatives charged him with what amounts to extortion for
personal political gain: Mr. Trump held up an arms sale and a White House
meeting in an effort to pressure the president of Ukraine to slander former
vice president Joe Biden. The House also charged Mr. Trump with illegally
refusing to cooperate with its investigation.
In
February, the Senate voted to acquit the president, with Sen. Mitt Romney of
Utah the lone Republican honest enough to acknowledge that the evidence was
irrefutable. A few other Republicans, perhaps embarrassed by their own moral
collapse, suggested that Mr. Trump would be chastened by impeachment and mend
his ways.
Instead,
he has been emboldened, and his behavior in the half-year since provides an
indication of the lawlessness we can expect if Mr. Trump is reelected. He has
swept aside US attorneys who would not bend the law to his whim; fired
officials throughout the government whose only offense was to do their jobs
honestly or seek to hold his administration accountable; sent unbadged troops
on to peaceful protesters in D.C. and Portland, Ore., for the benefit of his
reelection campaign; and ignored and lied about credible reports of Russian
bounties on U.S. soldiers.
President
Trump has sought to undermine confidence in democracy itself, lying about the
prevalence of fraud, floating the possibility of delaying the election and even
suggesting he may not accept its results.
These
are high crimes and misdemeanors, as the framers of the Constitution understood
the term. But this time it is up to us, the American people, to remove Mr.
Trump from office.
Well,
That’s it for the first episode of the series from The Post. I will leave the following articles to those
of you that want to be depressed while being reminded as to just how bad the
last 4 years have been for the great democratic experiment that is being
threatened today. This can be fixed if
everyone just votes to change the situation.
Copyright
G. Ater 2020
Comments
Post a Comment