FINALLY!!! A REPUBLICAN HAS THE GUTS TO STAND UP TO THE PRESIDENT!
…GOP Alaska
Senator, Lisa Murkowski
Even Utah
Senator, Mitt Romney agreed that the Mattis rebuke of the president was “stunning
and powerful.”
I hope most
of my readers were able to see or hear about the former defense secretary Jim
Mattis’ strong words against President Trump.
This move has forced most Republicans to choose sides between a revered
retired Marine Corps general and a leader with a virtual stranglehold on the Republican party.
In fact,
General Mattis did move one senior Senate Republican to finally declare she had
to speak out against Trump’s handling of the racial injustice protests. She also spoke out against Trump’s moral lack
of leadership, while signaling she may not support him in November.
“When
I saw General Mattis’s comments yesterday, I felt like perhaps we’re getting to
the point where we can be more honest with the concerns that we might hold
internally and have the courage of our own convictions to speak up,” said Sen.
Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), and chair of the Energy and Natural Resources
Committee.
Murkowski,
is the 10th-longest-serving active GOP senator. She told reporters that she agreed with the Mattis broadside that Trump tries to deliberately divide Americans and the
nation was “witnessing the consequences of three years without mature
leadership.”
A day
later, Sen. Murkowski praised former defense secretary Jim Mattis for
criticizing Trump’s recent actions. Murkowski
told reporters at the Capitol: “I thought General Mattis’s words were true, honest and necessary and overdue.” Her comments stood out among most Republicans,
who for the most part remained silent in the wake of Mattis’s criticism. Or
they accused the media of trying to stir controversy and/or they offered supportive
words for Trump.
Yet her
comments served as a stunning denunciation from within a party whose leaders on
Capitol Hill have either marched in lockstep with Trump or they have ducked any of his
controversial moves. They do this to the point that Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) was
the only Republican to vote to convict Trump at his impeachment trial earlier
this year.
Other
than Romney, they are all a bunch of “yes men and women” to the worst
president this country has ever seen.
Murkowski
says she has been chastised by her friends over the Republican silence over the
George Floyd murder.
Romney
had initially avoided addressing the matter, but after Murkowski spoke out, he
joined in criticizing Trump’s recent behavior by calling Mattis’s statement “stunning
and powerful.” “I think
the world of him. If I ever had to
choose somebody to be in a foxhole with, it would be with a General Mattis,” This is how the 2012 Republican presidential
nominee told the reporters.
As
expected, most of the other Republicans decided to remain in Trump’s political
foxhole. Oh, they offered praise for
Mattis’s more than four decades of military service, but they sidestepped his
feud with Trump that occurred during his two tumultuous years as secretary of
defense.
These
same Republicans had heralded Trump’s nomination of Mattis. They and many others saw Mattis as a
stabilizing force in the mercurial president’s Cabinet. Congress went so far as to change a law so the
retired general could serve in the civilian post despite being out of uniform
for just over four years. The law
had previously required seven years out of uniform for incoming defense
secretaries. But the
Senate approved his nomination 98 to 1 on the day Trump was inaugurated.
The
lackey Senator, Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) accused Mattis of “buying into a
narrative” from the news media that everything wrong with the country is
Trump’s fault.
“To
General Mattis, I think you’re missing something here, my friend. You’re
missing the fact that the liberal media has taken every event in the last
three-and-a-half years and laid it at the president’s feet. I’m not saying he’s
blameless, but I am saying that you’re buying into a narrative that I think is
quite frankly unfair,” Of course, Graham told this directly to Fox
News, and no other reporters.
In 2018,
when Senator Lindsay presented an award to Mattis, Graham had said the Pentagon chief was “somewhere
between Ronald Reagan and the Pope.”
“There
are very few people you can quote that the Senate and House cares about. When
General Mattis speaks as secretary of defense, people listen,” Graham had said.
Sen.
James M. Inhofe (R-OK) told reporters that Mattis has “always been one of my
favorite people” but said that his military background left him incapable
of handling the internal political battles inside a West Wing, being overseen by an
erratic president. “He’d never been
around that kind of environment, and consequently he was kind of encumbered
from the very beginning of not really understanding the political enemy,” Inhofe, the chairman of the Senate Armed
Services Committee had said this of the general.
But Inhofe
had told Mattis at his confirmation hearing: “I’m so excited that you’re
willing to do this.”
So, he has apparently written off the general.
Sen.
John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), a member of GOP leadership, said he had “a
great deal of respect” for Mattis and John Allen, a retired four-star
Marine general, but declined to address the contents of their sharp critiques
of Trump. “Everything I‘m focused on
right now is things that are going to bring everybody together rather than
divisiveness, and that’s what I’m focused on,” Barrasso told reporters.
Published
merely hours apart, Mattis wrote in a story published in The Atlantic, that Trump “is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite
the American people.”
John Allen
published a Foreign Policy op-ed lambasting the president for his threats to
use the military on protesters and his controversial church photo-op on Monday,
writing that Trump's actions, “may well signal the beginning of the end of the
American experiment.”
Yes, Allen is saying that Trump may try to become the first "American Dictator".
Of course,
Trump responded on Twitter by criticizing Mattis in a pair of tweets that had
at least two Trump lies.
“Probably
the only thing Barack Obama and I have in common is that we both had the honor
of firing Jim Mattis, the world’s most overrated General. (Not true.) I asked for his
letter of resignation, & felt great about it. His nickname was ‘Chaos’, which
I didn’t like, & changed it to ‘Mad Dog,’ ” Trump tweeted. (Also, not true.) “His
primary strength was not military, but rather personal public relations. I gave
him a new life, things to do, and battles to win, but he seldom ‘brought home
the bacon’. I didn’t like his ‘leadership’ style or much else about him, and
many others agree. Glad he is gone!”
Responding
further to Mattis, Trump on Thursday tweeted a letter from his former attorney
John Dowd, who was a captain in the Marine Corps and a member of the Judge
Advocate General Corps. Dowd wrote to Mattis that his critique left him “appalled
and upset.” and said the protesters outside the White House were “not
peaceful and are not real,” calling them “terrorists.” Dowd criticized Obama and maintains that Trump
has done more for minorities.
(Not True)
Another
retired Marine general, John Kelly, who served as Trump’s Chief of Staff, stood
by Mattis and rejected that assertion that Trump fired him, explaining Mattis
resigned at the end of 2018 in a policy dispute over U.S. military presence in
Syria. “The president did not fire
him. He did not ask for his resignation,” Kelly, a retired Marine Corps
general, said in an interview with The Washington Post, calling
Mattis an “honorable man.”
Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who was a Mattis ally and declared he
was “particularly distressed” by his 2018 resignation, ignored questions
from reporters about the former secretary’s comments at Thursday’s Senate
session. Senate Republicans did not discuss Mattis’s criticism of Trump at
their closed-door policy lunch.
Other
Republicans tried to explain the issue as a personality dispute that grew out
of Mattis’s tenure running the Pentagon.
“I think
it’s kind of obvious for some time that he and the president are on different
wavelengths,” Sen.
Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said, suggesting that today’s political moment makes it
hard for Trump to forge unity. "I don’t
share that view,” Roberts
said of Mattis’ statement. “I think he’s doing the best he can under very
difficult circumstances.”
But
Mattis’s assault showed the negative attitudes toward Trump that had not been
seen since the GOP revolt after his remarks in 2017 when he praised
white nationalists who caused riots in Charlottesville.
One of
the party’s prized House recruits disagreed Thursday with Trump’s tone
and how federal officers cleared the area outside St. John’s Episcopal
Church Monday so that he could visit.
“I would
like to see him lead by addressing the nation and call for everyone to come
together,” Ashley
Hinson, who won the GOP primary in Iowa’s 1st District on Tuesday, said.
“I don’t have all the details of what happened, obviously, but I’ve seen the
pictures and the video of what happened in Washington, D.C. I don’t believe
people in a peaceful protest should be cleared away for a photo op.”
Sen. Rob
Portman (R-OH said that Trump’s “prepared remarks” have included calls
for unity and also justice for the Floyd family, promising a fair prosecution
of the police charges in the case. “But his
tone and words kind of in between those more formal presentations have not
unified people, because it’s helped to push people,” Portman said.
And Sen.
Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), frustrated with the administration’s failure to
explain why Trump fired the intelligence community’s inspector general, blocked
two of Trump’s nominees, a rare move by a GOP senator.
Murkowski’s
break with Trump might be the strongest so far.
While Mitt Romney has had a personal feud with Trump predating his
presidency, as did the late John McCain (R-AZ) and former senators Jeff
Flake (R-AZ) and Bob Corker (R-TN)
.
Murkowski
had been a moderate Republican who has bucked Trump on significant votes, such
as confirming Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, but she rarely took her
views public, seldom appearing on TV news shows.
But one
day later, barely prompted to respond to Mattis, Murkowski expressed relief
that she was finally saying what she has grappled with for several years. “I am
struggling with it. I have struggled with it for a long time,” she said whether she could vote for Trump in
November. “I think
there are important conversations that we need to have as an American people
amongst ourselves about where we are right now,” she added.
Hopefully,
more Republicans will see the light and have the “cojones” to stand up for what’s
right.
But I’m not holding my breath.
Copyright
G. Ater 2020
Comments
Post a Comment