FORMER PRESIDENT OF IRAN’S VIEW OF TODAY’S AMERICA AND IRAN
… Abolhassan Bani-Sadr was the
first President of Iran
Mr. Bani-Sadr’s views on America
and Iran should be considered.
Abolhassan
Bani-Sadr was the first president of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He was
impeached by the Iranian Parliament as he was alleged to be against the Clerics
that were in charge of the country. He
has always said that he was not against clerics and he has said the then Ayatollah
Khomeini instigated his impeachment. He
has lived for decades in exile near Paris. He spoke with the WorldPost editor-in-chief, Nathan
Gardels, right after the president of the United States, Donald Trump,
announced the US was withdrawing from the Iran Nuclear Agreement for curbing
Iran’s nuclear weapons development.
When asked
what he thought was behind President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Iran
nuclear agreement, he answered with the following:
“Barack Obama’s government made the nuclear
agreement in order to balance the alliance of Israel and Saudi Arabia with
Iran’s presence in the region and therefore to prevent that alliance from
dominating the Middle East. Trump has
done the opposite: He withdrew from the agreement to make it possible for
Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United States to undo that balance.”
Mr. Gardels
then asked if he thought that this new policy would further isolate Iran, or
would it isolate the United States?
Bani-Sadr
stated: “The Europeans, including the
European Union, France, Germany and the United Kingdom, along with Russia and China,
signed the nuclear deal, and EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and the
leaders of France, Germany and the U.K. have made firm statements that they
will continue to support the deal no matter what the United States does. The
continent is coming to the conclusion that the United States, under Trump’s
presidency, is becoming a “rogue state” and is incapable of leading the ‘free
world.’ On this issue, it [the US] is now allied only with Israel and Saudi
Arabia. On the Paris climate pact Trump
already withdrew from it, and the United States is totally alone. Regarding
the Iranian regime, it all depends on the power struggle within the regime. If
President Hassan Rouhani can stay in power and remain in the agreement with the
other signatories, isolation will not be the country’s lot. However, if the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard commanders use this opportunity provided by Trump
to seek total control of the state and government, then the Iranian regime will
also become isolated.”
Bani-Sadr
still closely follows what is going on in American politics as he is aware of
the Trump administration’s key players and their position about Iran and issues
such as regime change in Iran, possible
future sanctions or even possible military intervention.
Per Bani-Sadr:
“John Bolton, Trump’s national security
advisor, is a well-known and public supporter of regime change in Iran. The
irony is that new sanctions and the threat of war will only help the Iranian
regime to solidify itself. Being able to leverage a constant state of crisis
provoked by the United States is what enables the regime to continue today. So,
paradoxically, Trump’s policy will make the regime stronger, not weaker. It
especially emboldens the hardliners who argued the United States couldn’t be trusted
in this kind of deal, the mirror image of the Trump argument about Iran.
Logically, if Trump is truly aiming at regime
change, the best way to achieve it is to remove all sanctions. This would
deprive the regime of the enemy that it needs in order to survive. It would
also provide the Iranian people with the breathing space they need to continue
the struggle for their independence, freedom and democracy.
However, if the United States were to attempt
or support military intervention to change the regime in Iran, it would face a
disaster many times worse than that experienced in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Everyone, irrespective of whether they are reformers or hardliners or
apolitical, will rise up against a foreign invader.”
Abolhassan
Bani-Sadr has long been an opponent of the theocratic regime in Tehran since
being driven into exile. But he does not
agree with President Trump or some Europeans, such as President Emmanuel Macron
of France, who say Iran is promoting war and turmoil across the Middle East. And he has an interesting theory that bears
serious consideration.
Per Bani-Sadr:
“It is a fact that the Iranian regime
uses terror as a method in the wars in which it is engaged. However, it is also
a fact that using terror to eliminate opponents is not a monopoly of this
regime. The Israeli government, to name one example, also has a long history of
eliminating its enemies through acts of assassination or other acts of terror.
Yes, it is true that I have long been an
ardent critic of the dictatorial regime in Iran, which has evolved into a
military-financial mafia. However, the truth should always be told. The fact is
that the United States and its allies started, or further inflamed, all
these wars across the Middle East. The United States alone started the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq. With France and others, they toppled Libyan leader
Muammar Gaddafi and opened a war there. Along with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and
Turkey, the United States armed jihadists in Syria. In Yemen, the United States
and its allies were involved long before Iran.”
Mr. Bani-Sadr
has described what is probably the view of many of those in the middle-east and
should be taken into consideration when there are future decisions about how to
deal with Iran and other middle-eastern nations. Many people from the US and other nations
have come to the conclusion that the US should never have gotten involved as we
did in the debacle of invading Iraq. In
addition, the US chose to ignore the old saying that “Afghanistan is the graveyard of Empires”, because that is where
empires go to fight and die. That is where the grandson of Genghis
Khan was killed, and that was the beginning of the end of the Soviet Union.
Today, the on-going conflict
between the US and Afghanistan has become the longest ever war of the United
States, and today there is no end in sight.
Perhaps the comment of the
former president of Iran should be given closer consideration by the free world’s
leaders.
Copyright
G.Ater and WorldPost 2018
(Please note that the WorldPost, is a partnership of the Berggruen
Institute and The Washington Post.)
Comments
Post a Comment