ACTING AGAIN LIKE A DICTATOR, TRUMP FIRES ANOTHER INSPECTOR GENERAL
…Trump’s Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo with the Prez
Now, four Inspector Generals have been fired by
President Trump.
It all happened as one would expect when a
dictator wants to get rid of those that are watchdogs for the improper actions of Trump’s
so called “Public Servants” .
President Trump’s Secretary of State lapdog,
Mike Pompeo, had his top aides blast the State Department’s ousted internal Inspector
General, Steve Linick. They accused him
of mis-handling leaks to the media and failing to promote Pompeo’s mission
statement to employees.
The remarks were an attempt to fill in the gaps
in the mysterious firing of Linick by President Trump late last Friday night. But the accusation instead raised new
questions about the dismissal and it exposed a sharp divide among State
Department employees.
This is the forth dismissal of an IG that happened to be examining whether Pompeo was having staffers do domestic chores, among other
mis-placed deeds. And it is a classic move by an authoritarian
leader, such as President Trump.
Many career officials viewed Linick as a dogged
investigator of those that didn’t follow the rules, and he was someone who
cultivated a reputation for total diligence.
But for the secretary’s hand-picked lackey advisers,
who found themselves on the wrong end of Linick’s investigations, the former
prosecutor could be a source of frustration and embarrassment. This was info from four US officials familiar
with the matter.
Linick was fired because Pompeo, who could not
fire an Inspector General, he had to ask the president to do the deed. He told The Post that he had advised
Trump to fire Linick, because he was not “performing a function”.
But the word on the street has it that Linick
was actually inspecting the Secretary of State for his misuse of his aides for
using them to do personal deeds for the Secretary and for the secretary’s
wife. The Secretary was also taking his wife
with him on official trips, at the tax payers expense, and this was also being
under investigation. The fired IG was examining whether Pompeo had a staffer
walking his dog, picking up his cleaning, and other duties.
All of the Inspector Generals that have been
released were also looking into areas that were where the president’s personal
appointees were not doing their jobs.
Here are those that have been fired so far:
- Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson: President Trump wrote to Congress on April 3, that he had no longer had confidence in Atkinson. It is interesting that Atkinson just happened to help facilitate the whistleblower complaint that led to Trump’s impeachment.
- The Department of Defense acting Inspector General, Glenn Fine, was to chair the panel overseeing coronavirus federal spending. But no official explanation was provided by Trump for the April 7 firing of IG Fine. Trump had said: “I don’t think I ever met Fine,” and suggested he was just cleaning out Obama-era holdovers, citing Obama’s nominees having, “reports of bias.”
- Trump replaced the Health and Human Services acting Inspector General Christi Grimm on May 1 with assistant US Attorney Jason Weida after Grimm released a report in late March that found “severe shortages of testing supplies” and “widespread shortages of personal protective equipment” among other problems experienced by medical workers battling the coronavirus. Trump later tweeted that Grimm was an Obama-era holdover who never contacted coronavirus task force members before conducting the report.
- The Trump administration firing of the State Department Inspector General, Steve Linick, was just last Friday. In a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Trump said he no longer had full confidence in Linick. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had asked Trump to fire Linick. House Democrats had also called on Linick to open an investigation into Pompeo’s efforts to secure an arms deal with Saudi Arabia. Linick was also investigating those reports that Pompeo used his staff to conduct his personal chores.
The Trump administration on Sunday also installed
Howard “Skip” Elliot as a new acting inspector general, replacing the Department
of Transportation acting Inspector General Mitch Behm. However, Mr. Behm, will remain in his prior
job as deputy inspector general…?
Trump’s IG shuffle has obviously brought on major
Democratic criticism, but his firing of Linick has raised bipartisan alarm in
Congress. Pelosi wrote to Trump Monday,
giving him a 30-day deadline to explain why Linick was fired.
On Monday, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said in a letter to Trump that his explanation of the firing is “not sufficient” to fulfill the Inspector General Reform Act. That is the law enshrines the rights of internal investigators. “Please provide a detailed reasoning for the removal of Inspector General Linick no later than June 1,” Grassley said.
One of Pompeo’s top aides, Brian Bulatao, said
concern over Linick had grown because of a “pattern of unauthorized
disclosures, or leaks,” to the news media about investigations that were in
their early stages. Bulatao said officials had no evidence Linick was
personally responsible for the leaks, but believed that they could taint the outcome
of ongoing probes.
Bulatao also said the secretary was frustrated
with Linick’s indifference to an “ethos statement” Pompeo formulated for
employees last year that includes mottos such as “I am a champion of
American diplomacy.”
The terms of Linick’s exit remain contentious.
In a letter sent to Congress on Friday, Trump said Linick’s removal would be
effective in “30 days,” giving him time to wind down his investigations. But Linick has since been told that he is
physically barred from returning to the State Department even to collect his
belongings. This is of course, complicating
his ability to finish his work. This is
per a US official, who like many others in Trump’s administration, always
speaks on the condition of anonymity.
Pompeo’s vague criticisms of Linick have left
questions about whether one of the inspector’s past or current investigations agitated
Pompeo enough to prompt the decision to remove him. Pompeo denied that it was
possible for him to retaliate for that reason, because, he said, he was not
told about the investigation of him until after the firing.
“I simply didn’t know. I [was not] briefed
on it,” he said.
But US officials, including Republican members
of Congress, are demanding answers for what they view as an extraordinary
punitive measure.
The large number of Inspector Generals were set
up by the Inspector General Reform Act. This occurred after the issues that were
brought up during the Watergate trials.
Today there are 74 Inspector Generals, 13 of which are vacant.
The nature of Linick’s work, which involved
interviewing various officials and uncovering acts of wrongdoing, means that
any investigation could be suspected of causing his downfall, and that his list
of enemies is long.
Before he was fired, Linick was investigating
an emergency declaration Trump made last year to approve an arms sale to Saudi
Arabia, a decision Pompeo had approved, said Rep. Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), the
top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
The arms transfer had been blocked by a
bipartisan group of lawmakers who opposed the killing of Yemeni civilians at
the hands of a Saudi-led coalition operating in that country. Engel, who
had requested Linick look into the order, said it was “another reason”
Trump may have fired the inspector general.
Pompeo told The Post he was not aware
Linick had been investigating the domestic errands issue. When asked whether the allegations
were true, he declined to comment. “I’m not going to answer the host of
unsubstantiated allegations about any of that,” he said.
Linick also took aim at powerful and connected
individuals within the Trump administration, including Robert Pence, a
Republican Party donor with close ties to Vice President Pence whom Trump
nominated for US ambassador to Finland. Last year, Linick’s
office wrote that Robert Pence, who is not related to the vice president,
had a conflict with his deputy that was not managed “in an appropriate
manner, which resulted in a breakdown of trust and communication that
complicated the chain of command and contributed to a stressful work
environment for Embassy Helsinki staff,” among other things.
Another well-connected official Linick took aim
at was Brian Hook, the special envoy for Iran, who maintains good relations
with Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and adviser. Linick’s office found that
an Iranian American career civil servant, Sahar Nowrouzzadeh, was retaliated
against because of her ethnicity and a perceived political bias. Hook came
under scrutiny in the probe because at the time she worked in his office.
The probe’s findings were released last fall,
which is when Pompeo’s aide, Bulatao, said the department became particularly
frustrated with leaks about IG investigations, in particular a Daily Beast report in
September focusing on Hook that cited “two government sources involved in carrying
out the investigation.”
Bulatao said the report deepened the
department’s skepticism of Linick, though there was no evidence that he was
involved in leaking to the website. “You know the IG is normally charged with
carrying out the investigation,” he said. “It certainly was a very strong
finger-pointing at IG Linick’s way.”
If Linick was targeted because of an
investigation, nonpartisan analysts have said his ouster would probably
constitute a violation of laws protecting inspectors.
“If the president has removed the inspector
general because of any investigation he is carrying out, that would be contrary
to the law,” said Ron Neumann, the president of the American Academy of
Diplomacy.
Neumann’s organization on Monday called for a
“more detailed and more complete” explanation of Linick’s firing “consistent
with the law.”
At the State Department, where many
diplomats are working from home while trying to juggle personal
responsibilities, some said Linick’s ouster further dampens department morale.
“It doesn’t touch most people directly. But it
undermines confidence the rules apply equally to everyone,” one
official said.
Trump, who is the only official legally capable
of firing the inspector general, has largely let Pompeo explain the decision.
“I never heard of him. But I was asked to by
the State Department, by Mike,” Trump told reporters at the White House.
Trump suggested that if Pompeo was using his
staff to do house chores, it would not be a significant breach.
“Do you mean that he is under investigation
because he had someone walk his dog from the government? I don't know. I don’t
think it sounds like that important,” Trump said. “Maybe he’s
negotiating with Kim Jong Un, okay, about nuclear weapons. They say: ‘Please,
can you walk my dog? You mind walking my dog? I’m talking to KJU or President
Xi. Please walk my dog.’ . . . The priorities are really screwed up when I read
this.”
It wasn’t just the chores that Pompeo was
asking for. What about taking his wife
on his official trips and that Pompeo had also set up a separate office for his
wife in the building, when he was the CIA Director. All of this was at the expense of the US taxpayers.
Just one more example of the president, and his staff''s leadership incompetence.
Copyright G. Ater 2020
Comments
Post a Comment